David A. Fahrenthold, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, dives into the controversial claims surrounding Elon Musk's DOGE project. He reveals alarming discrepancies in the purported savings from federal contracts, including a shocking typo that inflated values by billions. The conversation critiques the project's focus on minor contracts and the political motivations driving budget cuts. Fahrenthold also discusses the diminished credibility of financial claims, emphasizing the need for cautious oversight in government spending.
Doge’s claimed savings of $65 billion are significantly inflated, as an investigation reveals only about $16 billion in verified savings.
The project appears to serve a politically motivated agenda against certain agencies rather than focusing on genuine waste reduction in government spending.
Deep dives
Analysis of Savings Claims
Doge, the project aimed at cutting government spending under Elon Musk's direction, claims to have achieved significant savings, totaling $65 billion. However, a detailed investigation reveals discrepancies, as the itemized 'wall of receipts' accounts for only about $16 billion, with over 400 entries showing no savings at all. Mismanagement is evident, including errors such as claiming an $8 billion cut from a contract associated with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which paradoxically represents its entire budget. The analysis underscores the need for transparency and accuracy, highlighting that many claimed savings may not exist in reality, thus raising questions about the efficacy of their approach.
Methodological Flaws in Accounting
The analysis of Doge's savings list identifies various methodological errors, including the double counting of contracts and inaccuracies in reported savings. For instance, three separate entries for the same contract were erroneously attributed to different cancellations, leading to inflated savings figures. Additionally, some claimed cuts originated from contracts that had been terminated well before Doge's involvement, indicating either a lack of due diligence or a deliberate attempt to inflate their effectiveness. These flaws raise serious concerns regarding Doge's operational competence and its understanding of government contracting intricacies.
Political Agenda Behind the Cuts
Beyond the numerical discrepancies, the motives behind Doge's spending cuts appear politically driven, reflecting an ideological stance against agencies like USAID rather than a focus on waste and inefficiency. The project is perceived as a tool for enacting a more aggressive political agenda, underscoring a method of wielding power within the federal structure. This strategy not only threatens to reshape federal operations fundamentally but also raises alarm over potential long-term consequences for public services reliant on these agencies. The implications of these political motivations suggest a significant shift in how government functions may be anticipated under Doge's influence, with potential ramifications for citizens and services they depend on.
Since President Trump took office, Elon Musk and DOGE have wielded an unprecedented level of power to help the administration cut the U.S. government, and they claim to have stopped tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.
David A. Fahrenthold, an investigative reporter for The Times, explains why those claims are not what they seem — and what that tells us about Mr. Musk’s project to shrink the federal bureaucracy.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Photo: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode