The Political Orphanage

Rogue Judges and Birthright Citizenship

Oct 6, 2025
Tim Sandefur, Vice President for Legal Affairs at the Goldwater Institute, dives deep into the ramifications of the Supreme Court ruling on universal injunctions in Trump v. Casa. He tackles what it means for federal judicial power and the implications for birthright citizenship based on the 14th Amendment. Tim and the host explore the historical context of injunctions, the definition of jurisdiction, and whether the Constitution protects citizenship rights for undocumented immigrants. With a blend of legal insight and constitutional debate, Tim offers compelling perspectives on these hot-button issues.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Universal Injunctions Are Historical But Contested

  • Universal injunctions are an old equitable tool allowing courts to require or forbid actions broadly across jurisdictions.
  • Tim Sandefur argues the Supreme Court's limitation on them changes doctrine but not much in practice because other mechanisms achieve similar results.
INSIGHT

Nationwide Effect Via Different Doctrines

  • Courts can invalidate federal rules under the Administrative Procedure Act and that invalidation applies nationwide.
  • A judge's declaration of unconstitutionality in one district strongly influences other courts even if not technically binding.
INSIGHT

Formal Limits vs Practical Compliance

  • The Supreme Court emphasized courts only have authority over parties before them, limiting district judges' reach.
  • In practice, injunctions against the federal government often produce de facto nationwide compliance because agencies usually obey.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app