The Daily

A Louder, Messier Phase of Impeachment

Dec 4, 2019

Julie Hirschfeld Davis, the Congressional editor of The New York Times, brings her expertise to the exploration of the impeachment inquiry's transition from the Intelligence to the Judiciary Committee. She discusses the contrasting approaches of these committees and the strategic maneuvers at play. The podcast dives into the complexities of defining impeachable offenses, featuring testimonies highlighting President Trump's alleged coercive tactics regarding Ukraine. Davis also touches on political challenges and international tensions, showcasing the intricate landscape of current events.

25:22

Creator website

Episode guests

Julie Hirschfeld Davis

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Intro

2min

Impeachment Dynamics: Judiciary vs. Intelligence Committees

6min

Impeachment Inquiry Unveiled

7min

Impeachment Inquiry Analysis

11min

Navigating Political Challenges and International Tensions

2min

The House Intelligence Committee has released its impeachment report to the Judiciary Committee, signaling the end of one phase of impeachment and the beginning of another. Today, we break down the report and explore why those two phases will look so different. Guest: Julie Hirschfeld Davis, the congressional editor of The New York Times. For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily.

Background reading:

The House Intelligence Committee released its impeachment report this week, concluding that President Trump tried to “use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election.” Here are our key takeaways from the report.
Confused by what happens next? Our step-by-step guide to the impeachment process has you covered.

Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.