The Daily A Louder, Messier Phase of Impeachment
Dec 4, 2019
Julie Hirschfeld Davis, the Congressional editor of The New York Times, brings her expertise to the exploration of the impeachment inquiry's transition from the Intelligence to the Judiciary Committee. She discusses the contrasting approaches of these committees and the strategic maneuvers at play. The podcast dives into the complexities of defining impeachable offenses, featuring testimonies highlighting President Trump's alleged coercive tactics regarding Ukraine. Davis also touches on political challenges and international tensions, showcasing the intricate landscape of current events.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Contrasting Committees
- The House Intelligence Committee is known for being less partisan and focused on substantive matters, often working behind closed doors.
- In contrast, the House Judiciary Committee is known for its partisan debates and attracts members who seek the spotlight.
Rules and Control
- The Intelligence Committee's rules, designed for handling sensitive information, give the majority party significant control over proceedings.
- This allowed Chairman Adam Schiff to control the witness list and limit Republican interruptions.
Stefanik Silenced
- Republicans tried to have Elise Stefanik question Ambassador Yovanovitch, hoping to avoid criticism about their treatment of a female witness.
- Schiff used the committee rules to prevent Stefanik from speaking, highlighting the majority's control.