Alan Feuer, a reporter for The New York Times specializing in extremism and political violence, dives deep into the aftermath of the January 6th Capitol riot. He discusses how political narratives are being reshaped by figures like Donald Trump, who frames that violent day as one of love. Feuer interviews a rioter to reveal how anticipated pardons could alter the historical understanding of those events. The conversation touches on the implications for public trust in the legal system and examines the identities of individuals drawn into this politically charged saga.
The narrative surrounding the January 6th Capitol riot has been polarized, with participants often viewing themselves as peaceful protestors due to Trump's framing of the events.
Trump's proposed pardons for those involved in the riot pose significant threats to the integrity of legal outcomes and the historical understanding of that day.
Deep dives
Responses to January 6th Riot
The aftermath of the January 6th Capitol riot has created a polarized narrative surrounding the events of that day. Many participating individuals perceive themselves as peaceful protestors rather than insurrectionists, and this perspective has been amplified by former President Donald Trump, who frames the riot as a moment of love and patriotism. In stark contrast, legal proceedings reveal the day resulted in violence, leading to injury and death, undermining any claims to peaceful protest. As Trump suggests pardons for those charged, there exists a tangible threat to the established narrative and justice pertaining to the events of January 6th.
Legal Landscape of January 6th Participants
As of January 6, 2025, roughly 1,600 people face legal charges related to the Capitol riot, marking it as the largest investigation in the history of the Justice Department. Over a thousand have gone to trial or pled guilty, with a significant conviction rate, reflecting an unequivocal legal assessment of the day's violence. However, the prospective pardons that Trump proposes raise serious questions about the integrity of these legal outcomes. Such pardons could potentially rewrite the legal and historical context of January 6th, casting doubt on the judicial processes that have taken place.
Individual Stories from January 6th
The podcast features the story of Anthony Vo, a participant in the January 6th events, who adopted a narrative of being a peaceful protestor despite facing legal consequences. He reflects on entering the Capitol with awe, viewing it as a moment of exercising rights rather than unlawful behavior; however, he later grapples with the violence that unfolded. His experiences spotlight a wider tendency among defendants to rationalize their actions and detach from the violent aspects of the riot, which complicates the collective understanding of January 6th. This personal story underscores how individual interpretations of the events contribute to a broader dissonance in the narrative surrounding that day.
Implications of Potential Pardons
The discussion surrounding the implications of Trump's potential pardons for January 6th defendants highlights a significant risk to public trust in the legal system. If pardons were issued, it could not only undermine the convictions secured through extensive investigations but also allow for a revisionist history of January 6th that portrays participants as victims. This shift in narrative could have long-term effects on how the events are remembered and understood, threatening to erase the violent reality of the day. Additionally, Trump’s narrative positions himself as a champion for those he refers to as political hostages, appealing to a base that sees these pardons as an endorsement of their beliefs.
Since the riot on Capitol Hill four years ago, President-elect Donald Trump and his allies have set out to sanitize the events of that day, changing it from a day of violence into, in Mr. Trump’s words, a day of love.
As he prepares to take office for his second term, Mr. Trump said he plans to issue pardons to some of those responsible, throwing hundreds of criminal cases into doubt.
Alan Feuer, a reporter covering extremism and political violence for The New York Times, talks to one of those rioters and explains how the pardons could help rewrite the story of what happened on Jan. 6.
Guest: Alan Feuer, a reporter covering extremism and political violence for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode