
Main Justice
How do you Solve a Problem like Michael Cohen?
May 17, 2024
Key figures in Cohen's testimony, Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord discuss his evolving moral compass. They analyze his direct examination, anticipation for the trial's next phase, and handling of inconsistencies. Defense attorney Todd Blanche's intense cross examination is highlighted, setting the stage for the state's challenges in addressing these issues.
51:22
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Michael Cohen's evolving moral compass is a recurring theme in his testimony, posing challenges for the prosecution's credibility.
- The state must address Cohen's inconsistencies in redirect and closing arguments to bolster their case.
Deep dives
Summary of the Podcast Episode
In this podcast episode, the focus shifts to the trial involving Donald Trump. The direct examination and cross-examination of Michael Cohen, a key witness, is discussed. Cohen's testimony reveals details about his interactions with Trump, particularly involving the Stormy Daniels payment issue. The episode delves into the specifics of phone calls and text messages between Cohen and others, highlighting moments of importance in the trial process. The prosecutor's strategy, witness credibility, and potential impact of surrogate statements are analyzed, setting the stage for impending summations.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.