The Daily The Fate of the Filibuster
Jan 28, 2021
Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Congressional editor for The New York Times, offers an insightful look into the filibuster's contentious role in the Senate. She discusses its complex history, from major legislative moments like the 1964 Civil Rights Act to the strategic decisions made by Senate Democrats in 2013. The conversation navigates the current power struggles between Democrats and Republicans, particularly Mitch McConnell's resistance to changes. Hirschfeld also examines the ramifications of the filibuster on key issues like climate change and Biden's policy goals.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Filibuster Rule Mechanics
- The filibuster rule, requiring 60 Senate votes to end debate, embodies the Senate's consensus-driven nature.
- It contrasts with the House, where a simple majority rules.
Historical Filibuster Use
- Strom Thurmond's 24-hour filibuster in 1957 epitomizes its use to obstruct civil rights legislation.
- Southern senators also used it to delay the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Democrats' Nuclear Option
- In 2013, Democrats triggered the 'nuclear option', eliminating the filibuster for presidential nominations except Supreme Court.
- This was a response to Republican obstruction of Obama's nominees.