Chris Giles, an economics commentator for the Financial Times, joins to discuss new research challenging the prevailing views on income inequality in the US over the last 75 years. They dive into the contentious methodologies that highlight discrepancies in income data, especially regarding the top 1%. The conversation touches on how government spending impacts different income groups and presents diverse perspectives on the issue. Giles emphasizes the importance of debate in economics for refining understanding and pushing the field forward.
Recent research disputes the assumption of rising income inequality in the U.S., prompting a reevaluation of how this data is analyzed.
The debate on income inequality highlights other pressing forms of inequality, such as health disparities, that require urgent policy attention.
Deep dives
Inequality Disputed: Rethinking the Evidence
Recent research challenges the widely accepted narrative that income inequality in the United States has significantly increased over the past few decades. Economists Gerald Orton and David Splinter argue that when analyzing tax return data from 1960 to 2020, there has been little to no rise in inequality. Their findings contradict both the popular interpretations of Thomas Piketty's work and the conventional wisdom that supports the narrative of growing inequality. This contention has sparked a heated debate among economists, prompting a reevaluation of how income data is interpreted and represented.
Methodological Disagreements: The Battle for Accurate Measurement
The discussion surrounding income inequality is characterized by significant methodological disagreements between two camps of economists: the academic researchers who assert rising inequality and the government officials questioning that conclusion. A central point of contention revolves around how to account for capital gains, tax evasion, and the impact of marital status on reported income. For instance, discrepancies in tax filing behavior among different income groups can skew the apparent rise in inequality if not properly adjusted. This debate underscores the complexities involved in measuring inequality accurately and the implications these measurements have for societal understanding.
Broader Implications: Inequality Beyond Income
Despite the argument that income inequality might not have risen as dramatically as once thought, other forms of inequality, such as health and wealth disparities, remain concerning. The findings suggest a need to reassess societal issues beyond mere income figures, as dissatisfaction exists even amid debates about inequality metrics. Understanding why inequality in health outcomes and wealth distribution continues to rise could offer critical insights for policy formulation. Therefore, while income statistics are essential, they are only one aspect of a more nuanced societal landscape needing attention.
A recently released research paper calls into question many of the assumptions about the rate at which income inequality has grown in the US over the past 75 years. Today on the show, Soumaya and the FT’s economics commentator, Chris Giles, discuss this bombshell report, and what it means for economists thinking about wealth and income in the US.
To take part in the audience survey and be in with the chance to win a pair of Bose QuietComfort 35 wireless headphones, click here. Click here to find T&Cs for the prize draw.
Soumaya Keynes writes a column each week for the Financial Times. You can find it here