
New Books Network Carl Benedikt Frey, "How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations" (Princeton UP, 2025)
Nov 19, 2025
Carl Benedikt Frey, a Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor at the Oxford Internet Institute, delves into the complex relationship between technology and economic progress. He argues that historical stagnation reveals that progress isn't a given. Frey compares the fates of past powers like Victorian Britain and China, discussing how bureaucratic structures can both foster and hinder innovation. He highlights the need for decentralization to ignite growth, while warning that modern trends in both the U.S. and China might lead to stagnation if not addressed.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Progress Is Contingent, Not Inevitable
- Progress is not inevitable; industrial revolutions took hundreds of millennia to emerge.
- If progress were inevitable, every country would be rich and Britain wouldn't face productivity stagnation.
Bureaucracy Builds Scale But Curbs Exploration
- China's strong bureaucracy enabled large-scale infrastructure and market integration under the Song.
- That centralization pulled talent into state roles and reduced independent scientific and technical exploration.
Fragmentation Fueled European Innovation
- European political fragmentation created a market space for ideas and mobility of skilled craftsmen.
- That fragmentation plus cultural unity helped ideas and skills proliferate across states.


