Opening Arguments The Ghislaine Maxwell Interview Was Institutional Corruption Like We've Never Seen Before. Truly.
Aug 27, 2025
Liz Skeen, a defense attorney and former OA NYC bureau chief, joins the conversation to dissect the ramifications of Ghislaine Maxwell's recent proffer session with the DOJ. They explore the audacity of Maxwell's claims amidst implications of institutional corruption. The discussion touches on the legal intricacies of immunity and the troubling dynamics of high-profile political connections. Skeen highlights the absurdities of the case and the shadows cast over accountability in the justice system. This is a profound analysis of corruption entwined with power.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
DOJ Release Signals Norm-Shattering Politics
- The Maxwell proffer release is less about new facts and more about institutional corruption signals.
- Hosts say DOJ's handling marks a norm-shattering, unprecedented political move.
Six Hours Of Audio Needed Heavy Cleanup
- Thomas describes cleaning six hours of noisy DOJ audio to make Maxwell audible.
- He explains many clips were recorded poorly, requiring leveling and noise reduction.
Why This Proffer Is Legally Unusual
- Proffer sessions normally protect statements from use in a government's case in chief, with narrow exceptions.
- Maxwell's proffer after conviction is highly unorthodox and suggests a particular goal beyond normal cooperation.