

Clarence Thomas Loves Killing Potentially Innocent Men
Oct 18, 2024
The Supreme Court is back, and the implications of capital punishment are front and center, particularly in the controversial Glossip v. Oklahoma case. They dive into the haunting nuances of wrongful convictions, dissecting Richard Glossop's troubling experience on death row. With a blend of comedy and critique, the hosts discuss the ethical failings of both conservative and liberal justices. Enjoy a lighter moment as they reflect on quirky legal anecdotes and celebrate their listeners with a humorous twist!
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Intro
00:00 • 2min
The Imperative Against Capital Punishment in Glossop v. Oklahoma
01:31 • 4min
The Richard Glossop Case: Unraveling a Wrongful Conviction
05:06 • 15min
Ethics and Injustice on Death Row
20:17 • 8min
Judicial Absurdities and Death Penalty Dilemmas
28:39 • 16min
Legal Concerns and Southern Wit
44:41 • 5min
Political Maneuverings and Charismatic Legal Representation
49:58 • 2min
Lighthearted Reflections and Listener Support
52:08 • 2min