Nagarjuna's denial of motion and its location

Nagarjuna challenges the concept of motion by questioning its location. He argues that if we divide a path into different portions - the part already traversed, the part yet to be traversed, and the part currently being traversed - none of these portions can be the location of the motion. This leads to the conclusion that motion is occurring in a place that is being moved across, which is impossible according to Nagarjuna's argument. By using Sanskrit grammatical notions and examples, Nagarjuna highlights the emptiness and redundancy of statements about motion and argues that our natural languages have inadequate resources for describing it.