

Politics on Trial: Thomas More vs the King
7 snips May 29, 2025
Explore the riveting trial of Sir Thomas More, a clash of unwavering principles and royal expectations. Discover the moral dilemmas faced by advisors in the shadow of a powerful king. Unpack the complexities surrounding silence as a defense in court and the twisting narratives behind the prosecution. Delve into the stark contrasts between More and Cromwell, revealing their moral complexities amid political intrigue. This historic drama raises questions still relevant today about loyalty, conscience, and the nature of justice.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Law as Shield vs. Tool
- Thomas More and Thomas Cromwell were both lawyers and high-ranking legal figures with contrasting views on law.
- More saw law as a shield protecting conscience; Cromwell viewed it as a tool for power and reform.
Silence Is Not Treason
- More refused to take the oath but never explicitly stated his reasons, insisting silence is not proof of treason.
- His defense emphasized that the law protects private conscience from inference based on silence.
Henry VIII’s Need for a Shield
- Henry VIII wanted More to publicly support his break from Rome to protect his conscience and legitimize his second marriage.
- More's refusal threatened Henry's image and policy, highlighting power struggles between personal conscience and royal will.