The podcast takes a close look at the upcoming US Presidential election, discussing its razor-thin margins and the role of pivotal swing states. It delves into the complexities of the electoral system, historical elections like 2016 and 1824, and the impact of disenfranchisement. Expect riveting stories from the contentious 19th-century elections, including the dramatic battle between Grover Cleveland and James Blaine. The intricacies of how close calls have shaped America’s political landscape are explored, highlighting the unpredictable nature of elections.
The upcoming 2024 US election is poised to be extremely close, particularly in seven pivotal swing states that could decisively favor either candidate.
The unique Electoral College system complicates the definition of close elections, often allowing outcomes that differ from the popular vote.
Deep dives
The Current State of the Election
The upcoming 2024 US presidential election is shaping up to be incredibly close, particularly in seven key swing states that could favor either Trump or Harris. Polls indicate that the two candidates are separated by a minimal margin, often within two percentage points, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the election outcome. This situation has led many to label the election as potentially the closest in history, yet such claims evoke skepticism when considering the extensive history of US elections. A thorough examination of past contests reveals that while close elections certainly exist, the current race may not surpass some of the particularly narrow contests of the past.
Understanding Election Mechanics
The unique structure of the US electoral system contributes to what qualifies as a close election, as it does not solely rely on the popular vote but involves the Electoral College. This mechanism allows for scenarios where candidates can win the presidency without securing the most popular votes, as evidenced in past elections like that of Richard Nixon in 1968, who won decisively in the Electoral College despite a narrow popular vote margin. The Constitution's design intends to balance representation between populous and less populous states, leading to controversial outcomes where small shifts in voter turnout can significantly alter the election's result. A clear distinction exists between raw vote counts and the electoral framework, complicating the definition of what a close election entails.
Historical Close Elections
The podcast outlines historical close elections, starting with the election of 1824, which was so convoluted that it resulted in no clear winner after the first round of voting. Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and other notable figures competed in a fractured political landscape, leading to a decision by the House of Representatives that ultimately favored Adams, a situation perceived by Jackson as a 'corrupt bargain.' Another example cited is the 1876 election, marked by violence and intimidation surrounding the black vote, resulting in a divided outcome and fears of civil unrest, which were only resolved through a negotiated compromise that ended Reconstruction efforts. Each of these historical examples illustrates how high stakes, voter dynamics, and political maneuvering lead to outcomes that resonate deeply in the American political consciousness.
The Impact of Swing States
Swing states play a critical role in shifting the balance of presidential elections, as highlighted by pivotal moments in recent history such as the 2000 election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. The razor-thin margin in Florida, where just 537 votes decided the election, underlines the significance of every vote in these battleground areas. Not only was the election outcome determined by a small number of votes, but broader systemic issues included irregularities that affected voter intents, representing a microcosm of the democratic process. This narrative reinforces the idea that the polarization of pivotal states can lead to profound implications for governance and policy direction, shaping the administration for years to come.
The 2024 US Presidential election is just around the corner, and it seems like the result is balanced on a knife's edge. As the polls continue to roll in, pundits are predicting the closest US election ever. But we history lovers are always wary of the word 'ever', and so in this special Explainer episode, Dan gets under the hood of the US electoral system. How does it work, and is this truly the closest election in American history?
Written and produced by Dan Snow, and edited by Dougal Patmore.
Enjoy unlimited access to award-winning original documentaries that are released weekly and AD-FREE podcasts. Sign up HERE for 50% off for 3 months using code ‘DANSNOW’.
We'd love to hear from you - what do you want to hear an episode on? You can email the podcast at ds.hh@historyhit.com.