BI 203 David Krakauer: How To Think Like a Complexity Scientist
Jan 14, 2025
auto_awesome
David Krakauer, president of the Santa Fe Institute, is a prominent expert in complexity science and author of "The Complex World." In this intriguing discussion, he explores the four pillars of complexity—entropy, evolution, dynamics, and computation. Topics include the historical context of complexity science, the interplay of agency and emergent properties, and how time scales affect our understanding of systems. Krakauer also addresses the challenges of integrating various disciplines and the significance of information theory in neuroscience.
Complexity science integrates diverse fields by exploring how interconnected systems exhibit emergent behaviors, challenging traditional scientific paradigms.
The four pillars of complexity science—entropy, evolution, dynamics, and computation—form a framework that aids in understanding complex systems across disciplines.
Emergence and the influence of timescales are crucial for analyzing complex behaviors, emphasizing the significance of context in scientific observations.
Deep dives
Defining Complexity Science
Complexity science seeks to understand diverse fields of inquiry such as neuroscience, particle physics, and social systems by examining how these areas interconnect and produce emergent behaviors. The core essence of complexity science revolves around addressing fundamental concepts like agency, intentionality, and will, which challenge the foundational assumptions of physics. These ideas represent a significant shift in thinking about science, showing a clear departure from traditional paradigms that largely ignore the dynamics at play in systems characterized by complexity. This shift not only opens avenues for new scientific exploration but also integrates insights from numerous disciplines to provide a more comprehensive understanding of life and its processes.
The Four Pillars of Complexity Science
David Krakauer identifies four essential pillars of complexity science: entropy, evolution, dynamics, and computation. Each of these pillars contributes to understanding 'problem-solving matter,' which can be observed across multiple disciplines, including biology and economics. For instance, entropy illustrates how systems evolve towards states of disorder, while evolution highlights adaptation and change over time. By integrating these pillars, complexity science forms a rich framework that allows researchers to connect disparate areas and gain deeper insights into complex systems and their behaviors.
The Role of Emergence and Timescales
Emergence is a critical concept within complexity science, underscoring how new properties and behaviors arise from the interactions among simpler elements within a system. The discussion on timescales illustrates the importance of contextualizing phenomena, as behaviors and patterns perceived in the present might differ significantly when observed across longer or shorter timescales. For example, while a certain behavior may seem stable over millennia, it could be transient if viewed across a different timeframe. Understanding the relationship between emergence and timescales enriches the analytical tools complexity scientists use to study systems and their dynamics.
Interdisciplinary Connections and Methodologies
Complexity science thrives on integrating methodologies from various scientific fields, promoting the idea that insights can be obtained from outside traditional disciplinary boundaries. JSTOR or similar databases allow researchers to explore foundational papers across disciplines, encouraging the integration of methods such as scaling theory from physics or networks from social sciences. By studying intelligence through lenses like game theory and information dynamics, complexity scientists can investigate cognitive processes in a more interconnected way. This kind of interdisciplinary thinking not only enriches scientific inquiry but also increases the potential for groundbreaking discoveries.
Historical Context and Paradigm Shifts
Krakauer emphasizes the value of understanding the historical context surrounding complexity science, which has evolved over time through key figures and breakthroughs since the 19th century. The perspective generally reveals how early thoughts and theories morphed into modern complexity science as academia became more compartmentalized. While addressing philosophical questions about the nature of reality, complexity science also challenges established paradigms by questioning standard mechanistic approaches, signaling a profound shift in scientific thought. This re-examination of foundational concepts paves the way for future intellectual exploration and innovations in multiple scientific domains.
The Future of Complexity Science
Looking ahead, complexity science is seen as a maturing field that may continue to grapple with both methodological expansions and deeper theoretical questions. The discourse surrounding the role of emergent qualities suggests that complexity science should not become purely utilitarian but also sustain its connection to fundamental inquiries regarding life, intelligence, and agency. By maintaining an integrated approach that fosters both practical applications and high-level theoretical frameworks, complexity science has the potential to unravel some of the most pressing and intricate challenges of modern scholarship. As scientists engage with concepts of time, dynamics, and adaptation, the future holds promise for a richer understanding of complexity across diverse areas of research.
Support the show to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community.
The Transmitter is an online publication that aims to deliver useful information, insights and tools to build bridges across neuroscience and advance research. Visit thetransmitter.org to explore the latest neuroscience news and perspectives, written by journalists and scientists.
David Krakauer is the president of the Santa Fe Institute, where their mission is officially "Searching for Order in the Complexity of Evolving Worlds." When I think of the Santa Fe institute, I think of complexity science, because that is the common thread across the many subjects people study at SFI, like societies, economies, brains, machines, and evolution. David has been on before, and I invited him back to discuss some of the topics in his new book The Complex World: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Complexity Science.
The book on the one hand serves as an introduction and a guide to a 4 volume collection of foundational papers in complexity science, which you'll David discuss in a moment. On the other hand, The Complex World became much more, discussing and connecting ideas across the history of complexity science. Where did complexity science come from? How does it fit among other scientific paradigms? How did the breakthroughs come about? Along the way, we discuss the four pillars of complexity science - entropy, evolution, dynamics, and computation, and how complexity scientists draw from these four areas to study what David calls "problem-solving matter." We discuss emergence, the role of time scales, and plenty more all with my own self-serving goal to learn and practice how to think like a complexity scientist to improve my own work on how brains do things. Hopefully our conversation, and David's book, help you do the same.
0:00 - Intro
3:45 - Origins of The Complex World
20:10 - 4 pillars of complexity
36:27 - 40s to 70s in complexity
42:33 - How to proceed as a complexity scientist
54:32 - Broken symmetries
1:02:40 - Emergence
1:13:25 - Time scales and complexity
1:18:48 - Consensus and how ideas migrate
1:29:25 - Disciplinary matrix (Kuhn)
1:32:45 - Intelligence vs. life
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
