Tying utility profits to actually doing a good job
Oct 23, 2024
auto_awesome
Cara Goldenberg is a performance-based utility regulation expert at the Rocky Mountain Institute, and Laura Gonzalez specializes in PBR strategies with Clean Virginia. They delve into how traditional utility regulation fails to align with modern energy goals. The conversation highlights the shift to performance-based regulation (PBR), emphasizing its potential to enhance efficiency, equity, and decarbonization efforts. They explore successful PBR implementations, like Hawaii’s, and emphasize the need for continued stakeholder engagement and evolving metrics to ensure accountability in utility performance.
The traditional cost of service model misaligns utility profits with societal goals, incentivizing unnecessary infrastructure spending over energy efficiency.
Performance-based regulation realigns utility incentives to prioritize customer service, resilience, and decarbonization by tying profits to performance targets instead of sales volume.
Deep dives
Incentives and the Cost of Service Model
The regulatory structure governing investor-owned utilities is fundamentally misaligned with the goals of a sustainable energy transition, primarily due to the cost of service (COS) regulatory model. Under COS, utility profits are tied to the amount of electricity sold, which creates a strong incentive for utilities to invest in infrastructure rather than in energy efficiency or customer-centric solutions. This model encourages practices like 'gold plating,' where utilities overspend on unnecessary infrastructure to increase profit margins, and has resulted in a throughput incentive that discourages energy efficiency initiatives. Consequently, achieving modern energy goals requires a complete reevaluation of this outdated approach to regulation.
The Shift to Performance-Based Regulation
Performance-based regulation (PBR) represents a conceptual shift aimed at realigning the incentives of utilities to better match societal needs, such as equity and environmental sustainability. Rather than relying on the traditional COS model, PBR compensates utilities based on their performance against specific targets, promoting practices that support resilience and clean energy initiatives. A variety of PBR tools can be implemented, varying by state, with some of the most effective mechanisms including decoupling utilities’ revenues from energy sales, which mitigates the throughput incentive, and the establishment of multi-year rate plans. This innovative regulatory framework seeks to foster a competitive environment where utilities are rewarded for efficiency and customer service rather than mere sales volume.
Addressing the Perverse Incentives
Several perverse incentives inherent in the COS model hinder progress toward a modern electricity system, and these need to be addressed for effective regulation. Utilities often prioritize capital expenditures (CapEx) that yield guaranteed returns while neglecting operational expenses (OpEx) associated with maintaining or improving service quality. This bias towards CapEx can lead to inefficient spending and a lack of focus on customer satisfaction and innovation. By eliminating these negative incentives through PBR mechanisms, utilities can be encouraged to adopt strategies that enhance customer service, optimize resource usage, and invest in renewable energy technologies.
Challenges and Future of Utility Regulation
Implementing performance-based regulation presents both opportunities and challenges as stakeholders navigate its complexities. While some states have successfully adopted PBR frameworks with positive outcomes, there are significant hurdles, including resistance from utilities accustomed to the COS model and the inherent complexities of designing effective PBR systems. Continuous efforts are needed to educate regulators, utilities, and the public about the benefits of PBR, as well as to advocate for greater transparency and accountability in utility performance. Ultimately, the goal is to create a utility system that not only meets consumer needs but also aligns with broader environmental and social objectives.
In this episode, we’re diving into the wonky but vital topic of performance-based utility regulation (PBR) with Cara Goldenberg and Laura Gonzalez. We discuss how traditional utility regulation creates perverse incentives for utilities — and the tools PBR offers to better align incentives with modern priorities to like resilience, equity, and decarbonization. Dozens of states have adopted some form of PBR or other, and Virginia might be next.
This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.volts.wtf/subscribe
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode