This week on Data Over Dogma, Matthew and Paul discuss the authorship of the Bible, including who wrote the gospel of Matthew and the Pauline epistles. They delve into the complexities of the authorship of the Gospel of John, explore the identities of the authors of the New Testament, and address the disputed authorship of certain Pauline epistles. They also touch on the selective interpretation of religious texts and the neglect of women's rights.
The authorship of the four Gospels is disputed, with scholars proposing anonymous authors and later attribution of apostles' names.
The letters attributed to Apostle Paul, such as 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians, are doubted by scholars due to linguistic differences and lack of external evidence.
Deep dives
The Identity of the Gospel Authors is Questioned
The authorship of the four Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, is called into question. The names of the apostles traditionally associated with these Gospels may not be the actual authors. Scholars propose that the Gospels were written anonymously and that the names of the apostles were later attributed to them. There is no direct evidence in the Gospels themselves identifying their authors. Moreover, linguistic analysis reveals significant differences in language and style between the Gospels and the writings of Paul. The Gospel authors are also associated with specific communities or traditions, suggesting that multiple authors or editors were involved in their creation. The traditional authorship attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John emerged in the second century CE and may have been influenced by a manuscript tradition that became widely accepted in the Christian community.
The Disputed Pauline Epistles
Among the letters attributed to the Apostle Paul, there are several that are disputed by scholars. These include 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. The language and style of these epistles differ from the genuine Pauline epistles and contain words not found in his other writings. While some scholars argue for Pauline authorship, the majority consider these epistles to be written by later authors in Paul's name. The external evidence, including early church writings and manuscript evidence, also raises doubts about the authenticity of these disputed epistles.
The Spurious Pastoral Epistles
The pastoral epistles, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, and Titus, are widely considered to be spurious or falsely attributed to Paul. These epistles differ significantly in language, content, and theological themes from the genuine Pauline epistles. They focus on issues of church organization, the qualifications of church leaders, and the long-term life of the church. Scholars argue that the language and concerns of the pastoral epistles align more closely with the late first century and early second century CE, suggesting that they were written after Paul's death by authors seeking to assert their authority over the church. Some early Christian writers also expressed doubts about the authenticity of these epistles.
Will the real authors of the Bible please stand up?
This week on Data Over Dogma, we dig deep into who wrote what and why we know what we know. Did someone named Matthew write the gospel of Matthew? Did Paul actually write ALL the Pauline epistles? Authorship is a big question when it comes to the Bible, and it can be a very contentious topic. But don't worry. We'll get through this together.
For early access to an ad-free version of the show, exclusive content, and an opportunity to support our work, please consider becoming a monthly patron at: