Episode 392: Old code and choosing my annual reviewers
Jan 22, 2024
auto_awesome
The podcast discusses the challenges of relying on a tool built by one person when that person is retiring soon. The team is worried about the lack of knowledge and potential breakdown once the boss leaves. They also explore the dilemma of choosing reviewers for annual reviews - opting for those who make you look good or those who provide actionable feedback. The hosts discuss the importance of seeking unfiltered feedback from peers and the dynamics of feedback from bosses.
When choosing reviewers for your annual review, prioritize those who may provide actionable feedback rather than focusing on those who would make you look the best.
In a situation where the boss plans to retire and the team is heavily reliant on their expertise, it is essential to proactively address the leadership, request to shadow the boss, and gradually develop a succession plan.
Deep dives
Choosing Reviewers for Annual Review
When selecting reviewers for your annual review, it is suggested to prioritize those who may provide actionable feedback rather than solely focusing on those who would make you look the best. In this situation, where the listener expects to receive a rating of 'meets expectations' and is not concerned about promotion or termination, seeking valuable feedback from peers can be an opportunity for growth and improvement. By selecting reviewers who may provide constructive criticism, the listener can gather unfiltered insights that they may not typically receive. This feedback can help them identify areas for improvement and calibrate their performance.
Preparing for a Boss' Retirement
In a team where the boss is the sole maintainer of a crucial tool and plans to retire, concerns arise about the team's sustainability and potential breakdown in operations once the boss leaves. The listener questions whether they should simply plan for a job switch. One suggestion is to proactively address the leadership regarding the impending retirement and the need for a succession plan. This could involve asking to shadow the boss in leadership meetings and actively learning the code of the tool. Alternatively, the listener could take on the challenge of reverse-engineering the tool and gradually substituting their own version, ensuring a smooth transition of responsibilities.
Choosing Reviewers for Annual Review
When deciding on reviewers for an annual review, it is important to consider the intended outcome. If the listener's objective is to gather constructive feedback that may help them improve, they should choose reviewers who are likely to provide valuable insights. By selecting individuals who are willing to give honest feedback, the listener can collect actionable suggestions and identify areas for growth. However, if the listener is satisfied with a rating of 'meets expectations' and is not seeking significant advancement or concerned about negative consequences, they may choose reviewers who will likely provide positive feedback. It can be beneficial to communicate with their boss, express the desire for specific feedback, and share prepared questions to prompt reviewers' insights.
In this episode, Dave and Jamison answer these questions:
We are a team of under 10 people who provide technical services to other departments of our organization. We use a tool that is built by my boss to supplement our work but it is crucial for the team to do actual work. The boss maintains it all by themselves and nobody is familiar with its code.
The boss is going to retire in a year or two, nobody wants to learn the code of that tool and the team can’t do much without the boss as we are more or less just individual contributors writing standalone code and delivering it to other teams who asked for it. Only the boss attends the leadership meetings and the developers are completely unaware of the remaining processes that happen in the background, i.e., communicating with other departments to bring in work, and all that business stuff. I am afraid the team would break apart once the boss retires because nobody knows anything on how our team operates beyond within team level except for the boss. Shall I just plan for the job switch?
It’s annual review season! When choosing reviewers, do I a) choose the reviewers that will make me look the best or 2) choose the reviewers who might actually give me actionable feedback?
If it helps, I am on very good terms with my boss and his boss, as well as most of the C-Suite, and there is no way that I get either a promotion or fired in this review cycle. I have been a top performer in previous review cycles, but I expect that I won’t be reviewed so highly this time around.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode