The Argument

Are Children People?

10 snips
Jan 26, 2026
Rita Koganzon, an associate professor of political theory at UNC Chapel Hill who studies education, childhood, and family. She argues for fixed-age adult-style rights and explains why granting full autonomy to kids creates dangerous implications. They debate limits between protection and autonomy, the role of parents and the state, and why schools and curricula rest on adult expertise.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Host's Moment Of Parental Curiosity

  • Jerusalem Demsas recounts personal reactions to online parenting debates and how they prompted deeper questions about children's autonomy.
  • That curiosity led her to read scholarship and seek Rita Koganzon's perspective on children's rights and liberalism.
INSIGHT

Child Liberationists Exposed Liberal Tensions

  • Child liberationists extended liberal equality logically to kids and argued children were an oppressed class deserving rights.
  • Their logic exposed hard trade-offs about autonomy, especially sexual autonomy, that made the project politically untenable.
INSIGHT

Age Of Majority Preserves Liberal Freedom

  • Liberal citizenship depends on reason, so law presumes an age of majority rather than testing individuals' maturity.
  • Giving an authority discretion to judge maturity risks tyranny, so a fixed age preserves freedom despite arbitrariness.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app