Drilled
Drilled Presents...Spill: Mary Annaise Heglar & Amy Westervelt on climate in this week's debate, Project 2025, and a whole lot more
Sep 9, 2024
Mary Annaise Heglar, an advocate for climate rethinking, and journalist Amy Westervelt dive deep into Project 2025 and its implications for climate policy. They share frustrations about the disconnection in current climate advocacy, critique the historical ties of environmental movements to social justice, and discuss the risks associated with privatizing weather data. They also tackle the ethical dilemmas in climate journalism and the shifting dynamics of political engagement as they humorously examine voter sentiments leading into the election.
53:40
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Project 2025's approach prioritizes political appointees over scientific expertise, jeopardizing the integrity of climate-related policymaking and public health.
- The initiative threatens to dismantle environmental justice efforts, exacerbating inequalities and neglecting marginalized communities in climate policy discussions.
Deep dives
Impact of Project 2025 on Climate Policymaking
Project 2025 outlines a strategy that seeks to heavily influence climate-related policymaking in the U.S. by promoting the appointment of individuals without scientific backgrounds to key environmental positions. The emphasis on political over scientific qualifications raises concerns about undermining scientific integrity in environmental regulations. Critically, it suggests a shift towards prioritizing political agendas over empirical data, potentially leading to decisions that could harm public health and environmental protection. This approach signals a broader trend that may stifle legitimate science and progress in addressing climate change.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
