ChatGPT and the Foolishness of Speech | Prof. Jane Sloan Peters
Jul 24, 2024
auto_awesome
Prof. Jane Sloan Peters discusses AI ChatGPT from a Thomistic perspective, comparing human intelligence and AI speech. The podcast explores ChatGPT's language understanding, Aquinas' views on human speech, and the ethical implications of using AI in academia. Aquinas' comparison of human and divine speech is also analyzed, emphasizing the role of human communication in deepening one's connection with God.
AI's rapid advancements in mimicking human conversation and passing comprehension tests prompt debates on its role in communication and potential to surpass human intelligence.
Aquinas's perspective on human speech, reflecting the divine Word and emphasizing imperfections, challenges the use of AI-generated content in intellectual growth.
Deep dives
Artificial Intelligence: Humanity's Battle and Complicated Relationship
Artificial intelligence, exemplified by Deep Blue's victory over Gary Kasparov and modern iterations like GPT-4, raises the philosophical debate of machine versus man. The ability of AI to mimic human conversation and pass comprehension tests like the Turing test highlights its rapid advancements. Questions of whether AI like GPT-4 can aid or hinder human communication, or potentially surpass human intelligence, are central concerns provoking enthusiasm and skepticism across different sectors.
The Inner Workings of ChatGPT and its Training
ChatGPT, a language model chatbot, developed by OpenAI, operates via the generative pre-trained transformer model. Its extensive training on vast amounts of data, alignment by humans, and transformer architecture enable it to process data more effectively, representing the relationships between words in complex multi-dimensional space. The introduction of randomness through 'temperature' ensures varied responses, mirroring human conversation.
Aquinas's Philosophical Approach to Human Speech
Aquinas, influenced by Aristotle and Christian tradition, views human speech as reflecting the eternal Word of God. Human speech arises from the intellect and the formation of interior words that convey concepts, drawing parallels to the divine Word. Aquinas emphasizes the complexity and imperfections of human speech, contrasting it with the perfect and immediate understanding embodied in the divine Word.
The Ethical Implications of Using ChatGPT in Academia
The ethical implications of using ChatGPT in academic settings raise questions of intellectual dishonesty and personal growth. Thomas Aquinas's teachings on speech challenge the use of AI-generated content, emphasizing the importance of personal understanding and concept formation. Using AI tools like ChatGPT may hinder intellectual growth by bypassing the essential cognitive processes involved in knowledge acquisition and communication.
Jane Sloan Peters is an Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at the College of Mount Saint Vincent in Riverdale, NY. Her dissertation explored Thomas Aquinas's reception of Greek patristic and Byzantine biblical interpretation for his four-volume commentary on the Gospels, the Catena Aurea. She lives in Connecticut with her husband and two sons.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode