

Why U.S. Soldiers Won’t Come to Ukraine’s Rescue
Feb 17, 2022
David E. Sanger, White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times, delves into the complexities of U.S. military strategy regarding Ukraine. He discusses why President Biden has ruled out direct troop involvement despite past interventions. Sanger highlights the challenges of provoking a superpower like Russia, emphasizing the careful balance needed to avoid escalating tensions. He also reflects on non-interventionist principles shaping U.S. foreign policy and the broader geopolitical consequences of the current conflict.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Lack of Vital Interest
- The U.S. avoids direct conflict with Russia in Ukraine because it lacks a vital national interest there.
- Protecting Ukraine's sovereignty is important, but not enough to risk a major war.
Escalation Risks
- Avoiding escalation with Russia is crucial due to their nuclear arsenal and cyber capabilities.
- Direct conflict risks unpredictable consequences.
Biden's Non-Interventionism
- Biden's non-interventionist stance reflects his long-held beliefs and campaign promises.
- He prioritizes ending wars, not starting new ones.