Toby Nangle, a former asset manager and current journalist at the FT, delves into the murky ethics of investing for authoritarian regimes. He shares his journey from finance to journalism after grappling with moral dilemmas surrounding human rights abuses in sovereign wealth funds. The conversation highlights the tension between profit and personal values, stressing the need for ethical engagement in investment practices. Nangle also reflects on the political implications of these investments, like how they can serve dual economic and political goals.
Toby Nangle's departure from asset management reflects the growing ethical dilemmas faced by professionals managing funds for authoritarian regimes.
The podcast emphasizes the importance of engaging ethically with sovereign wealth funds to address the moral implications of their investments.
Deep dives
The Moral Crossroads of Asset Management
Toby Nangle discusses his departure from asset management after realizing the ethical implications of managing money for authoritarian regimes. He highlights significant events, such as the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, which prompted him to reassess his professional contributions and values. Nangle reflects on the discomfort of serving clients who were implicated in heinous actions, suggesting that asset managers contribute to these regimes' power by enhancing their wealth. He emphasizes the dilemma of reconciling professional duties with personal ethics, raising questions about where to draw the line when it comes to complicity in unethical practices.
Engagement vs. Exit in Ethical Investing
The discussion delves into the tension between staying in asset management to enact change versus exiting due to ethical concerns. Nangle posits that engagement is often more beneficial than disengagement, as leaving the industry could diminish the influence of ethical voices within it. He outlines a framework for asset managers, based on the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to assess their influence and decision-making regarding clients. This highlights the complex balance between personal moral lines and the broader implications of managing wealth for contentious regimes.
Sovereign Wealth Funds and Global Influence
Nangle addresses the growing significance of sovereign wealth funds, which manage trillions of dollars in assets and wield substantial global influence. He questions whether these funds prioritize traditional market capitalism or if they use their wealth to pursue non-monetary strategic goals, such as projecting power or distracting from human rights abuses. The conversation acknowledges that while the majority of investments may align with market principles, there are motivations behind certain acquisitions that raise ethical concerns. Ultimately, the need for greater awareness and scrutiny of the political and moral implications of these funds is emphasized, underscoring the responsibility of investment professionals.
Toby Nangle is a regular contributor to the FT. Before he was a journalist, he was an asset manager for more than 25 years, and many of his clients were sovereign wealth funds. And some of the sovereigns of those wealth funds were doing things that made Nangle uncomfortable. So he quit. Today on the show, we discuss a massive problem faced by the investment industry: the ethical behaviour of its clients.