The Peter Attia Drive

#380 ‒ The seed oil debate: are they uniquely harmful relative to other dietary fats? | Layne Norton, Ph.D.

240 snips
Jan 19, 2026
Layne Norton, Ph.D., a nutrition scientist and accomplished power athlete, dives deep into the seed oil debate. He argues that seed oils aren't uniquely harmful, focusing on the evidence surrounding LDL oxidation and atherosclerosis. Norton critiques the common anti-seed oil claims while highlighting biases in scientific studies. He also discusses the influence of industrial processing and ancestral diets, offering practical dietary guidance for healthier choices—emphasizing that broader lifestyle factors are more pivotal to health than just dietary fats.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Isocaloric Harm Is The Real Question

  • The core question is whether seed oils are uniquely harmful under isocaloric conditions compared to other fats.
  • Peter frames the debate to test if seed oils have intrinsic harm beyond excess calories.
ANECDOTE

Personal Shift From Low-Carb Bias

  • Layne describes his funding from industry groups while admitting he once favored low-carb/animal-based views.
  • He changed his stance when evidence pointed toward LDL importance.
INSIGHT

Bias Is Universal; Use Converging Evidence

  • Everyone has biases and must acknowledge them when interpreting nutrition research.
  • Layne Norton stresses converging lines of evidence over single studies or funding-based assumptions.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app