The Monocle Daily Why the Pentagon's new press rules have been rejected by news outlets
23 snips
Oct 14, 2025 Phil Clark, a Professor of International Politics, and Marion Mesmer, a Senior Research Fellow in International Security, delve into the Pentagon's newly rejected press rules, discussing the implications for journalism. They analyze how this loss of access may lead to more rigorous reporting. Andrew Hussey, author of 'Fractured France', explores the deep political and cultural divisions in contemporary France, tying them to historical contexts and examining the future political landscape post-Macron.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Pentagon Press Rules Spark Media Revolt
- The Pentagon's new reporting rules demanded journalists pledge not to obtain unauthorised material and restrict access without officials.
- Phil Clark and Marion Mesmer argued most US media rejected it as a near-censorious move that would harm oversight.
Rules Look Like Draft Review
- The rule reads almost like pre-publication oversight, bordering on requiring the Pentagon to see drafts.
- Clark warned this is brazen and risks turning reporting into a managed, uncritical show.
Refuse To Preserve Independent Reporting
- Rejecting restrictive access can push journalists to pursue sources outside official channels.
- Marion Mesmer suggested refusing the rules may spur leaks and more robust investigative reporting.
