The Safety of Work Ep. 120: What does the literature say about safety professionals?
David and Drew share insights into Dr. Provan’s PhD research journey, exploring the scarce guidance and fragmented views within academic research on safety practices. They discuss the challenges of painting a clear picture of the day-to-day responsibilities of safety professionals and how this prompted an in-depth investigation into the profession. As we peel back the layers of existing literature, we touch on the difficulty and complexity of condensing a vast array of theories and studies into a cohesive academic narrative.
The varied titles and the global patchwork of research that span numerous fields are explored, and although David’s search through databases and beyond revealed a trove of about 100 relevant articles, more insights may remain hidden. The discussion culminates with a look at the strategies employed by safety professionals to wield influence, foster trust, and align safety objectives with organizational goals. David's firsthand experiences and academic findings paint a vivid picture of the complex identity and influence that safety professionals must navigate in their pivotal roles.
The Paper’s Abstract
Safety professionals have been working within organizations since the early 1900s. During the past 25 years, societal pressure and political intervention concerning the management of safety risks in organizations has driven dramatic change in safety professional practice. What are the factors that influence the role of safety professionals? This paper reviews more than 100 publications. Thematic analysis identified 25 factors in three categories: institutional, relational, and individual. The review highlights a dearth of empirical research into the practice and role of safety professionals, which may result in some ineffectiveness. Practical implications and an empirical research agenda regarding safety professional practice are proposed.
Discussion Points:
- Safety professionals - are they a “necessary evil”?
- The role and perception of safety professionals, scarcity and fragmentation of literature, and challenges in condensing research. Safety positions have many varying titles globally.
- Institutional, organizational, and individual factors, regulatory environments, and professional associations
- Safety professionals face challenges when reporting to line managers, limiting their ability to challenge leadership and prioritize protection over workers.
- Balancing safety independence and bureaucracy
- A construction industry study - testing bureaucracy
- Alliance vs. Influence - Safety professionals act as the conscience of the organization, using constructive challenge and alliances to advocate for safety and align goals with broader objectives.
- Influence and trust in safety management - relational legitimacy, influence tactics, and symbolic enablers to promote best practices and trust within organizations.
- Practical takeaways from the paper
- The answer to our episode’s question is, “This is still an area of safety science that is a prime candidate for more PhD and postdoc research.”
Quotes:
“I went into this going, what has been published on the safety profession? And to do that, went to a couple of the key databases and used very deliberate keyword searches…” - David
“That was probably one of the first challenges- is that this role gets called so many different things in one country, let alone globally.” - David
“The included pieces were all in peer-reviewed publications, but there's a range of quality to those publications.”- David
“This connection between the bureaucratic activities of safety professionals and the value that the people who are exposed to the risk see in having a safety team was one of the most stark research findings in the literature.” - David
“Don't learn how to do your job from a TED Talk regardless of how inspirational a new view that talk is.” - Drew
Resources:
The Paper: Bureaucracy, Influence, and Beliefs