

Vindictive Prosecution? Comey & Abrego Garcia
Oct 7, 2025
Discussing the legality and implications of a proposed 'perp walk' for Jim Comey, the hosts explore its potential impact on prosecution credibility. They also dive into a ruling regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, highlighting signs of vindictive prosecution by the government. Furthermore, the podcast addresses a federal judge's decision that prevented the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Portland, raising questions about government authority and judicial oversight.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Perp Walks Are Officially Banned But Occur
- DOJ policy officially bans 'perp walks' that alert press to an arrest or parade a defendant into court.
- Despite the ban, prosecutors and agents have sometimes orchestrated public arrests, and those actions draw internal discipline and controversy.
A Front-Page Arrest Drew Holder's Rebuke
- Preet recounts an early insider-trading arrest that appeared orchestrated and drew rebuke from Eric Holder.
- An FBI agent's improper dealings with press created a front-page spectacle and internal fallout.
Reported Perp Walk Plan Signals Political Motive
- Reporting claimed DOJ officials planned a staged perp walk for Jim Comey despite a summons.
- Such theatrics suggest motives beyond securing convictions, including humiliation and political signaling.