Neuroscientists and AI experts discuss the relationship between neuroscience and AI at the COSYNE conference. They explore historical influences, evolving research approaches, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration for progress. Topics include the shift in priorities from neuroscience to AI, the intersection of neuroscience and AI, and predictions for the future of neuro-AI in 2044.
Integrating biological insights into AI enhances model performance and understanding.
Establishing a common language between neuroscience and AI is crucial for bridging the disciplines.
Collaboration between neuroscience and AI drives scientific insights and technological advances.
Deep dives
Discussion on the Relationship Between Neuroscience and AI
The panel at the Computational and Systems Neuroscience Conference focused on the relationship between neuroscience and AI. Panelists like Tony Zador discussed the historical influence of neuroscience on AI, emphasizing the need for incorporating biological insights into artificial neural networks. In contrast, some panelists highlighted the limited recent impact of neuroscience on AI advancements, expressing skepticism about the current direction of integrating neuroscience ideas into AI models.
Exploring Common Languages Between Neuroscience and AI
Audience members raised questions about establishing a common language between neuroscience and AI. Discussions delved into the potential for dynamical systems to bridge the disciplines, with insights on how AI models are drawing inspiration from non-mammalian brains and cellular automata. The evolving nature of AI applications and the exploration of shared vocabularies with neuroscience point towards a growing intersection of concepts.
Motivations for Integrating Neuroscience and AI
Panelists reflected on their motivations for integrating neuroscience and AI, citing reasons such as enhancing understanding by building models, unravelling complexities in brain functions through AI tools, and leveraging insights for disease research and brain decoding. The exploration of non-traditional models and tools like transformers hinted at the potential for bi-directional discoveries between neuroscience and AI, driven by a quest to broaden scientific insights and technological applications.
The Quest for Long Time Scales in Artificial Systems and the Brain
Exploring the quest for achieving long time scales in artificial systems and the brain, the podcast delves into the challenges of context-dependent processing and how linear state space models are gaining attention as potentially succeeding the transformer model. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding information processing and long time scales, both in artificial systems and in the brain, posing intriguing questions on achieving context-dependent processing.
The Interplay Between Neuroscience, AI, and Cognitive Science for Understanding Information Processing
The conversation delves into the mutualistic relationships between neuroscience, AI, and cognitive science, emphasizing the need for increased collaboration and interdisciplinary approaches. By examining how neuroscience and AI can inform each other, the discussion emphasizes the value of merging ideas from multiple scientific fields to gain insights into information processing machines. The podcast suggests that incorporating machine learning and AI courses in neuroscience education can enhance theoretical understanding and drive research forward.
Support the show to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community.
Recently I was invited to moderate a panel at the annual Computational and Systems Neuroscience, or COSYNE, conference. This year was the 20th anniversary of COSYNE, and we were in Lisbon Porturgal. The panel goal was to discuss the relationship between neuroscience and AI. The panelists were Tony Zador, Alex Pouget, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Kim Stachenfeld, Jonathan Pillow, and Eva Dyer. And I'll let them introduce themselves soon. Two of the panelists, Tony and Alex, co-founded COSYNE those 20 years ago, and they continue to have different views about the neuro-AI relationship. Tony has been on the podcast before and will return soon, and I'll also have Kim Stachenfeld on in a couple episodes. I think this was a fun discussion, and I hope you enjoy it. There's plenty of back and forth, a wide range of opinions, and some criticism from one of the audience questioners. This is an edited audio version, to remove long dead space and such. There's about 30 minutes of just panel, then the panel starts fielding questions from the audience.
