

Fund Researcher: No matter what valuation approach you choose, ether remains overvalued
May 12, 2025
Kevin Mills, Head of Research at Triton Liquid and FJ Labs, discusses Ethereum’s valuation challenges with Pascal Hugli. They critique Ethereum's dual role as a gas token and a store of value, arguing it leads to market disconnects. Topics include cash flow analysis, institutional perspectives, and Layer 2 solutions. Mills emphasizes Ethereum’s potential as an internet-native commodity and highlights the necessity for investors to navigate the evolving crypto landscape with clarity. Their insights reveal a nuanced understanding of market dynamics and the future of digital assets.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Ethereum's Conflicted Value Proposition
- Ethereum tries to be both store of value and gas token, but these roles conflict fundamentally.
- This contradiction undermines its valuation and the idea of it as "ultrasound money" has weakened.
John Pfeffer's 2017 Critique Validated
- John Pfeffer argued in 2017 that native tokens of blockchains are poor long-term investments due to competitive dynamics and lack of strong value moats.
- His skepticism about smart contract platforms remains relevant as Ethereum's valuation disconnect persists.
Institutions Demand Real Value
- Institutional buyers apply stricter valuation discipline than retail, exposing Ethereum's market cap as disconnected from economic fundamentals.
- Ethereum's valuation at hundreds of billions is not justified outside of speculative venture bets today.