

Michael Munger on the Perfect vs. the Good
6 snips Apr 24, 2023
Michael Munger, a Duke University economist and former gubernatorial candidate, explores the tension between idealism and pragmatism in political discourse. He discusses directionalists versus destinationists—how some aim for practical change while others hold out for ideal outcomes. The conversation delves into education reform, rent control, and minimum wage laws, questioning their implications on liberty. Munger also reflects on the evolving political landscape and the philosophical foundations of capitalism, sharing insights on moral principles and individual choice in today's society.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Munger's School Choice Proposal
- Michael Munger ran for governor of North Carolina in 2008 on a libertarian platform advocating for school choice, especially vouchers for poorer counties.
- Many libertarian colleagues criticized this, wanting immediate elimination of all school taxes instead of improving the existing system.
Directionalists vs. Destinationists
- Free-market advocates can be divided into directionalists, who seek incremental improvements within existing systems, and destinationists, who demand complete adherence to their ideal.
- This distinction explains why free-market advocates often clash, hindering their ability to influence policy.
The Perfect vs. The Good
- Destinationists, with their utopian goal of no public schools, would never accept policies that maintain the system.
- They believe that considering other goals prevents achieving good outcomes.