The Constitution Drafting Project: A Discussion of Five New Amendments
Feb 9, 2024
auto_awesome
Panelists discuss the Constitution Drafting Project and the agreement on five amendments. They highlight the importance of civil discourse, proposed amendments, and the significance of protecting individual rights. The discussion includes debates over the citizenship requirement for President, principles for amending the Constitution, removing incompetent members from government, term limits for Supreme Court justices, interpretations and goals of the Declaration, and expressing gratitude for the project's commitment to civil dialogue and the Constitution's ideals.
56:51
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The drafters of the proposed amendments focused on structural reforms such as amending the amendment process, reinvigorating Congress through a legislative veto, and implementing term limits for Supreme Court justices.
The process of drafting the amendments showcased the potential for civil discourse and constitutional agreement amidst political polarization, emphasizing the importance of cross-partisan dialogue.
The drafters drew inspiration from the principles of the Declaration of Independence, highlighting the significance of concepts like liberty, equality, and consent of the governed in shaping the proposed amendments.
Deep dives
Proposed Constitutional Amendments for Deliberation
Three teams of constitutional scholars drafted 5 amendments to the Constitution, demonstrating the potential for civil discourse and constitutional agreement. The amendments focused on structural reforms such as amending the amendment process, reinvigorating Congress through a legislative veto, and implementing term limits for Supreme Court justices.
The Importance of Amending the Constitution
As the Constitution creates a binding debt against future generations, conservatives feel it is important to amend the Constitution in the next few decades to address changing times and prevent it from becoming outdated. The hope is that college and law students, who will be debating the proposed amendments, can reach an agreement, showcasing the possibility for constitutional agreement amidst political polarization.
Deliberations and Compromises in Drafting Amendments
The drafters of the proposed amendments engaged in collegial and thoughtful deliberations, making concessions and compromises to reach agreement. The process involved discussions on topics such as the threshold for impeachment, the amendment process itself, Supreme Court term limits, and the legislative veto, all with the aim of promoting self-governance, protecting individual rights, and balancing the powers of different branches of government.
The Influence of the Declaration of Independence
The drafters of the amendments drew inspiration from the principles of the Declaration of Independence, including concepts of liberty, equality, and consent of the governed. While there were differing interpretations and priorities, all teams recognized the importance of these foundational principles in shaping the amendments.
Campaign Finance and Citizens United
The issue of campaign finance and the impact of money in politics, including the Citizens United decision, was not directly addressed in the proposed amendments. Team progressives recognized the need for reasonable restrictions on money in campaigns, while team libertarians believed that individuals have the right to contribute to political causes, including through corporations. The differing views highlight broader debates about the role of money in politics and the balance between free speech and limiting undue influence.
In this week’s episode, we are sharing audio from a program hosted live from Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and presented in partnership with ASU’s Center for Constitution Design. The program centered around a discussion of the National Constitution Center’s landmark Constitution Drafting Project, and featured members from each project team— Georgetown Law’s Caroline Fredrickson of Team Progressive, the Goldwater Institute’s Timothy Sandefur of Team Libertarian, and ASU’s Ilan Wurman of Team Conservative. They discuss their approaches to constitution drafting, review points of consensus and disagreement, and reflect on the importance of cross-partisan dialogue in today’s constitutional environment. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. This program was presented live on February 1, 2024.