On the Media Trump Guns for the FTC. Plus, Are We the Losers in the Paramount v Netflix Battle?
11 snips
Dec 13, 2025 
Noah Rosenblum, an associate professor of law, discusses how the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Slaughter could radically increase presidential powers, affecting government integrity. Media reporter Oliver Darcy dives into the fierce bidding war between Netflix and Paramount for Warner Bros. Discovery, highlighting the potential fallout for CNN. Joel Simon, a journalism expert, explores the implications of the Perez Hilton subpoena case, emphasizing the need for stronger legal protections for journalists amidst evolving media landscapes.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Removal Power Was Left Intentionally Ambiguous
- The Constitution left removal power ambiguous, so later politics and precedent filled the gap.
- Noah Rosenblum explains framers opted to defer structural details to future legislation and practice.
Two Landmark Cases Shaped Removal Law
- Myers and Humphreys executor shaped the removal doctrine through real presidential clashes.
- Rosenblum recounts Myers (postmaster) and Humphreys (FTC) as pivotal Supreme Court moments.
Court's Move Reflects Presidentialism, Not Originalism
- The current conservative majority favors expanding presidential removal power despite historical evidence to the contrary.
- Rosenblum argues this shift reflects presidentialism more than genuine originalism.