Revolutions often lead to reigns of terror characterized by political violence to purge enemies and create a new society.
Moderate leaders may suppress radical challenges through bloody weeks of political violence, preserving their power and preventing social revolution.
Deep dives
The Reign of Terror: Political Violence within the Revolution
During a revolution, a radical faction may seize control of the government, leading to a reign of terror characterized by political violence. This violence aims to purge perceived enemies of the revolution, using mechanisms such as surveillance, citizen denunciations, mass arrests, and summary executions. The radical leaders seek to eliminate rival political factions, establish their preponderance of force, and create a new society. While famous figures like aristocrats and revolutionary leaders often capture attention, the majority of victims are commoners, including peasants, workers, and lower-class individuals who run afoul of the regime or happen to reside in areas of unrest.
Bloody Weeks: State Violence to Restore Order
As revolutions reach a second wave, moderate leaders may suppress radical challenges through a campaign of political violence known as bloody weeks. This period involves restoring order and eliminating the radical wing of the revolution through martial law, mass arrests, and summary executions. The targets are politically radical individuals who attempted to further challenge or overthrow the moderate regime. Victims are often lower-middle class and lower-class individuals, including students, artisans, soldiers, and sailors. The goal is to preserve the established center of power, prevent social revolution, and affirm the regime's monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
Justifications for Violence: The Why of Political Massacres
Both reigns of terror and bloody weeks are justified by the revolutionaries to achieve certain goals. Reigns of terror, perpetuated by radicals, aim to win wars, mobilize resources, eliminate rival political factions, establish preponderance of force, and create a new society. Bloody weeks, perpetrated by moderates, aim to restore order, prevent radical challenges, and maintain their own position of power. The justifications often hinge on winning wars, economic mobilization, political rivalry, sovereignty, and a desire to cleanse society. In both cases, violence is used to preserve the power and legitimacy of the revolutionary regime.
Mechanisms of Violence: Tribunals and Perfunctory Justice
Mechanisms of violence in both reigns of terror and bloody weeks involve different approaches to justice. Reigns of terror typically utilize revolutionary tribunals, which in the French Revolution initially followed rules of evidence before devolving into kangaroo court style proceedings. Accusations revolved around colluding with enemies of the revolution, corrupt self-dealing, or economic hoarding. Bloody weeks may also employ legal procedures, but due to rapid arrests and martial law, there is a summary and perfunctory nature to the justice. Radical leaders are often summarily shot, and those arrested may face hasty trials or immediate execution without regular legal processes.