Dr. Tim Muehlhoff, a communications professor at Biola University, joins the conversation on the role of preferred pronouns in Christian communities. They debate whether using these pronouns reflects respect or undermines biblical teachings. The dialogue covers navigating relationships with the LGBTQ community, the importance of empathy in discussing gender identity, and the need for understanding amidst differing interpretations of scripture. They emphasize fostering respectful dialogue and the complexities of communication in culturally sensitive discussions.
The debate centers on using preferred pronouns as a relational strategy while balancing biblical truth and personal beliefs.
Participants explore the contrasting approaches of 'calling in' versus 'calling out' to foster respectful dialogue around sensitive topics.
Empathy is essential in conversations about pronouns, emphasizing understanding individual experiences without compromising one's faith stance.
Deep dives
Disagreement on Preferred Pronouns
The conversation centers on the complex issue of whether Christians should use preferred pronouns when interacting with individuals from the LGBTQ community. One perspective emphasizes using these pronouns as a matter of wisdom, suggesting that it may help maintain relationships while also communicating God’s truth. However, there is strong resistance from those who see using preferred pronouns as a moral compromise that could compromise biblical truth. The underlying tension is about navigating grace and truth, where one participant feels that maintaining truth should take precedence over relational dynamics.
The Concept of Calling In vs. Calling Out
A significant part of the dialogue revolves around the rhetorical strategies of 'calling in' versus 'calling out.' Calling someone in involves creating a safe space for dialogue and understanding, whereas calling out tends to shame or condemn without engaging on a personal level. One participant illustrates this by reflecting on how to have conversations about sensitive issues like preferred pronoun usage without shutting down communication. This is contrasted with more dogmatic approaches, where participants feel comfortable disagreeing while still valuing the other’s perspective.
Situational Flexibility in Communication
The discussion touches on how context influences communication strategies among Christians, particularly regarding sensitive topics. One participant cites biblical examples where the Apostle Paul adjusted his approach depending on the audience, suggesting that flexibility could apply to the current debate on pronouns. They argue that using preferred pronouns in certain contexts does not dilute one's faith but rather opens doors for further conversations about biblical teachings. This situational approach raises questions of accountability and how believers can engage without affirming ideologies that contradict their beliefs.
Empathy and Understanding in Conversations
Empathy plays a crucial role in navigating discussions about pronoun usage and sexual identity. Among the key insights shared is the importance of listening to individuals' experiences and understanding the deeper emotional context surrounding their identities. One participant argued that refusing to use preferred pronouns might communicate disrespect or dehumanization, which can obstruct meaningful dialogue. They stress that showing empathy does not equate to agreement but can facilitate a more comprehensive exploration of faith and personal beliefs.
Cultural and Theological Implications
The episode emphasizes the cultural implications of language choices in addressing gender identity and its connection to Christian doctrine. There’s a consensus that these discussions are not merely about personal preferences but rather reflect broader theological positions regarding identity and dignity. Participants highlight the need to maintain a balance between authenticity to one's faith and engaging thoughtfully with contemporary societal norms. This leads them to reflect on the importance of teaching and fortifying biblical truth while engaging compassionately with differing viewpoints.
Should Christians use preferred pronouns? Is it an act of respect and charity, or is it compromising the creation narrative? How can Christians navigate relationships when people want them to use preferred pronouns? In this engaging dialogue, Sean and Biola communications professor Dr. Tim Muehlhoff discuss these questions and more. In co-writing their book End the Stalemate, Sean and Tim realized they have much in common, but also some practical and biblical differences about how and when to use (and not use) preferred pronouns. They aim to model a healthy dialogue about a contentious issue.
READ: End the Stalemate, by Sean McDowell & Tim Muehlhoff (https://amzn.to/3WjBRqw)
*Get a MASTERS IN APOLOGETICS or SCIENCE AND RELIGION at BIOLA (https://bit.ly/3LdNqKf)
*USE Discount Code [SMDCERTDISC] for 25% off the BIOLA APOLOGETICS CERTIFICATE program (https://bit.ly/3AzfPFM)
*See our fully online UNDERGRAD DEGREE in Bible, Theology, and Apologetics: (https://bit.ly/448STKK)
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Sean_McDowell
TikTok: @sean_mcdowell
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmcdowell/
Website: https://seanmcdowell.org
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
