

Predictive AI, Manipulation, and Human Freedom According to Aquinas I Fr. Anselm Ramelow, O.P.
Sep 8, 2025
Fr. Anselm Ramelow, O.P., a philosophy professor with deep expertise in Aquinas, dives into the complex relationship between AI, free will, and manipulation. He explores how AI's predictive power challenges traditional notions of personhood and choice. The discussion also includes the impact of predictive technology on human freedom, drawing on thinkers like Adorno and Skinner. Ramelow highlights the moral implications of statistical predictability in our behavior, urging awareness in an increasingly manipulative digital age.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Prediction Enables Manipulation
- Prediction enables manipulation because knowing likely choices lets agents push choices toward ends.
- Fr. Anselm links AI predictability to older technologies of control like propaganda and surveillance.
Historical Warnings About Social Control
- Fr. Anselm recounts historical thinkers from Skinner to Adorno showing longstanding worries about manipulating humans.
- He cites Walden II and The Dialectic of Enlightenment as examples of technological social control narratives.
Statistics Don't Erase Individual Freedom
- Statistical predictability of behavior does not imply individual necessity; collective trends differ from individual freedom.
- Aquinas and Jesuit debates treat probabilities like dice rolls: collective regularity but individual indeterminacy.