
More or Less RCP 8.5: Why did the climate change model get it wrong?
65 snips
Dec 13, 2025 Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist and research lead at Stripe, dives into the controversies surrounding the RCP 8.5 climate scenario that shaped early 21st-century predictions of global warming. He explains how this worst-case scenario was misinterpreted as a business-as-usual pathway, leading to inflated temperature projections. Hausfather discusses the shift towards renewable energy sources and how our updated understanding estimates a more realistic temperature increase of 2.5 to 3 degrees Celsius. It's a crucial conversation about adapting our climate strategies.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
RCP 8.5 Was An Extremes-Only Scenario
- RCP 8.5 was a high-end scenario used to model enormous warming by century's end.
- It represented an extreme 'no-policy' 90th-percentile outcome, not the most likely future.
Extreme Coal Assumptions Underpin 8.5
- The original RCP 8.5 assumptions included burning five times more coal by century's end.
- One imagined world even used coal-to-liquids to run cars, echoing South Africa's historical practice.
Worst Case Mistaken For Business As Usual
- RCP 8.5 was increasingly used as 'business as usual' despite being intended as a worst-case.
- That misinterpretation led major reports to treat an extreme tail outcome as the likely baseline.
