This American Life 594: My Summer Self
The Lifeguard Who Fought the Speedo Rule at 66 and Won
Roy Lester, a 66-year-old bankruptcy attorney and long-time lifeguard at Jones Beach, refused to wear the official Speedo suit for a swim test, which led to his termination. He preferred wearing jammers because they are more modest and comfortable, especially as he aged. Despite the state's insistence on the Speedo as uniform, Roy stood his ground, likening his refusal to a matter of principle against age discrimination.
Roy eventually sued the New York State Office of Parks and Recreation in a protracted legal battle that questioned uniform policies targeting older lifeguards. He proved his fitness and dedication despite his age, having performed over a thousand rescues. The fight highlighted issues of age bias, workplace dignity, and the importance of choice even in small things like swimwear.
This story invites reflection on how rules can invisibly enforce discrimination and how standing up for oneself can challenge long-standing institutional norms.
Lifeguard's Stand Against Speedo
- Roy Lester lifeguarded for 40 years at Jones Beach and is a dedicated summer lifeguard at age 66.
- He refused to take the required swim test in a Speedo and lost his job over it, citing principle and modesty.
Speedo Rule Masks Age Bias
- The Speedo rule is less about swim performance and more about age discrimination and union management conflict.
- Older lifeguards keep influence that management may want to diminish by enforcing uniform changes selectively.
