Who cared? The disappearance of Amber Haigh, part 8
Aug 18, 2024
auto_awesome
Ben Doherty, a seasoned reporter, shares insights on the gripping trial of Robert and Anne Geeves for the murder of Amber Haigh. Alongside journalist Bridie Jabour, they discuss the prosecution's compelling closing arguments, which suggest a dangerous motive and the possibility of Amber's death before her disappearance. The defense counters with claims of bias and insufficient evidence. The pair also explore the emotional weight of the case and the uncertainty that looms over the community as they await the judge's ruling.
The prosecution's argument hinged on the claim that Robert and Anne Jeeves murdered Amber Haigh to eliminate her as a threat to their desire to adopt her son.
The defense emphasized the presumption of innocence by pointing out the gaps in evidence and challenging the credibility of witness testimonies.
Deep dives
The Trial's Conclusion and Key Arguments
The trial of Robert and Anne Jeeves for the murder of Amber Haig has concluded after eight weeks of evidence presented in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales. The Crown's closing submissions argued that Amber Haig, who disappeared in June 2002, was murdered by the Jeeves as they sought to keep her infant son, whom they desired to adopt. The prosecutor detailed the couples' manipulative relationship with Haig, asserting they viewed her as a liability who needed to be eliminated to secure their parental desires. Significant focus was placed on their lengthy delay in reporting her missing, suggesting they were aware of her fate and indicating their involvement in her disappearance.
Defense's Presentation and Community Influences
The defense team, particularly Michael King representing Anne Jeeves, presented an argument that emphasized the presumption of innocence and questioned the reliability of the evidence against the Jeeves. They highlighted the historical context of community suspicion surrounding Robert Jeeves, suggesting that past incidents had unfairly shaped public perception, leading to a bias in the investigation. King argued that the focus on the Jeeves as prime suspects for Amber's disappearance arose from community rumors rather than substantiated evidence. He maintained that the prosecution's case relied on conjecture and suggested that substantial gaps in the evidence undermined the charges brought against them.
Contention Over Witness Credibility and Closing Remarks
A critical point of contention in the trial was the testimony of a key witness, James Arbour, whose statement about seeing Amber Haig with the Jeeves came under heavy scrutiny. The defense contended that Arbour's accounts were inconsistent and more a product of suggestion than reliable evidence, which could not be trusted to support the prosecution’s claims. Furthermore, the defense team addressed the argument of the Jeeves speaking of Amber in the past tense during police interviews, asserting this was a mere linguistic issue and not indicative of guilt. Ultimately, the defense called for a not guilty verdict, emphasizing that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven their case beyond reasonable doubt.
All the evidence in the trial of Robert and Anne Geeves for the murder of Amber Haigh has now been heard. Reporter Ben Doherty tells Bridie Jabour about the final week in the NSW supreme court, each side’s closing submissions and what happens next
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode