.jpg&w=320&h=320&output=jpg)
Full Story
Who cared? The disappearance of Amber Haigh, part 8
Aug 18, 2024
Ben Doherty, a seasoned reporter, shares insights on the gripping trial of Robert and Anne Geeves for the murder of Amber Haigh. Alongside journalist Bridie Jabour, they discuss the prosecution's compelling closing arguments, which suggest a dangerous motive and the possibility of Amber's death before her disappearance. The defense counters with claims of bias and insufficient evidence. The pair also explore the emotional weight of the case and the uncertainty that looms over the community as they await the judge's ruling.
32:22
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The prosecution's argument hinged on the claim that Robert and Anne Jeeves murdered Amber Haigh to eliminate her as a threat to their desire to adopt her son.
- The defense emphasized the presumption of innocence by pointing out the gaps in evidence and challenging the credibility of witness testimonies.
Deep dives
The Trial's Conclusion and Key Arguments
The trial of Robert and Anne Jeeves for the murder of Amber Haig has concluded after eight weeks of evidence presented in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales. The Crown's closing submissions argued that Amber Haig, who disappeared in June 2002, was murdered by the Jeeves as they sought to keep her infant son, whom they desired to adopt. The prosecutor detailed the couples' manipulative relationship with Haig, asserting they viewed her as a liability who needed to be eliminated to secure their parental desires. Significant focus was placed on their lengthy delay in reporting her missing, suggesting they were aware of her fate and indicating their involvement in her disappearance.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
