#132 7 Bible Verses That DON’T Prove Sola Scriptura - Joe Heschmeyer
Dec 19, 2024
auto_awesome
Dive into an enlightening discussion about Sola Scriptura and the Bible verses often cited to support it. The host challenges popular interpretations, revealing how context shifts their meaning. Traditional teachings versus scripture come under scrutiny, prompting listeners to reconsider the validity of relying solely on the Bible. The conversation addresses the role of divine revelation and points out gaps in the New Testament's claims about its own inspiration. This journey through biblical texts encourages a deeper understanding of faith and tradition.
The concept of Sola Scriptura has evolved over time, revealing that its interpretation can vary significantly among different Protestant groups.
Biblical verses often cited in support of Sola Scriptura, like 2 Timothy 3:16-17, fail to consider their original biblical context.
The critique of human traditions in Mark 7:8-9 is misapplied if used to dismiss all traditions, including those of divine origin.
Deep dives
Defining Sola Scriptura
Sola Scriptura, meaning 'scripture alone', is often defined among Protestants in various ways. Traditionally, it asserts that all necessary doctrines must derive from scripture, claiming that the Church and its councils are fallible. While some modern interpretations simplify Sola Scriptura to mean that only explicit scripture is authoritative, its historical context suggests a broader interpretation that entails all necessary details for salvation must be found within scripture. Understanding these nuances is vital to address its implications and the arguments surrounding it.
Misinterpretation of 2 Timothy 3:16-17
2 Timothy 3:16-17 is frequently cited as evidence for Sola Scriptura, asserting that scripture equips believers for every good work. However, the interpretation that this indicates scripture is the sole source of doctrine fails to recognize that Paul is speaking of the scriptures available to Timothy, primarily the Old Testament. Paul affirms the value of scripture but does not imply that it is the only means of equipping believers for righteousness. Thus, using this passage as a proof for Sola Scriptura overlooks its true context and meaning.
Faulty Application of Mark 7:8-9
In Mark 7:8-9, Jesus criticizes the Pharisees for prioritizing human traditions over God’s commandments. This verse is sometimes misapplied to argue against any form of tradition, wrongly suggesting that it dismisses all traditions as inferior. However, the Catholic perspective acknowledges that while human traditions can be flawed, divine traditions, which are not of human origin, exist and hold significance. Therefore, extrapolating a universal condemnation of all traditions from this passage is a simplistic interpretation of scripture.
Problems with Revelation 22:18-19
Revelation 22:18-19 warns against altering the text of Revelation, and some use this to argue for Sola Scriptura. However, this passage merely pertains to the book of Revelation and does not extend to the entire canon of scripture as understood today. The call to avoid adding to or removing from this prophecy addresses tampering with the specific writings of that book, not the broader context of biblical doctrine or knowledge. Consequently, applying this warning to all scriptural texts is a misrepresentation of its intent.
Contextual Misreading of 1 Corinthians 4:6
1 Corinthians 4:6 encourages the Corinthians not to go beyond what is written, and this is often interpreted as support for Sola Scriptura. However, this admonition is directed towards avoiding pride and factionalism among believers rather than a blanket prohibition against new doctrines. When Paul refers to 'what is written,' he is discussing unity and humility rather than expressly limiting teaching to the scriptures. Thus, applying this verse to support Sola Scriptura misunderstands the original context and intent of Paul's message.
Joe Heschmeyer examines many of the Protestant arguments in favor of Sola Scriptura, how it changed over time and why “un-Biblical” doesn’t mean “anti-Biblical.”
Transcript:
Joe:
Welcome back to Shameless Popery. I’m Joe Heschmeyer and today I want to explore seven Bible verses that I’ve heard Protestants use to support the idea of sola script Torah or the Bible alone. And then why I don’t think any of them actually work if you read them in their proper biblical context. Now, before I go any further, I should really quickly clarify what do…
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode