After the End of Truth | John Searle, Hilary Lawson, Hannah Dawson
Aug 31, 2016
auto_awesome
Join John Searle, a leading philosopher from UC Berkeley, Hilary Lawson, a critic of realism and founder of How the Light Gets In, and Hannah Dawson, a lecturer and author, as they tackle the crisis of truth in contemporary discourse. They explore how a generation shaped by postmodernism grapples with objectivity and meaning. The guests challenge the tyranny of truth claims, emphasizing the importance of narrative and wisdom over rigid realism. They also delve into how language and human categories influence our understanding of reality.
The podcast emphasizes that while subjective narratives shape our understanding, objective truths still exist and are essential for coherent communication.
A non-realist approach to truth can foster creativity in interpretations, but it poses risks of eroding accountability in political narratives.
Deep dives
The Nature of Truth
The podcast explores the complex concept of truth and its relevance in contemporary philosophy. One speaker argues that traditional realism has failed, suggesting that it is not possible to accurately link language with an independent reality. Instead, they propose a non-realist theory emphasizing the importance of creating narratives that serve useful functions in our lives rather than seeking an ultimate objective truth. This approach shifts the focus toward the idea of wisdom, where the aim is to refine narratives based on their effectiveness rather than their claim to absolute truth.
Objective vs. Subjective Knowledge
A crucial distinction is made between epistemic objectivity and ontological subjectivity, highlighted by a speaker who discusses the necessity of recognizing both types in knowledge claims. They assert that while our understanding of the world is inevitably shaped by human perspectives, it does not negate the existence of objective truths, such as the law of gravitation. This perspective contends that our classification of knowledge is influenced by subjective factors yet affirms that objective truths exist and are vital for coherent communication. The speaker emphasizes that denying an objective reality undercuts our ability to effectively engage with the world around us.
The Role of Interpretative Narrative
The discussion also delves into the historical perspective on truth and how narratives shape our understanding of past events. A reference is made to how historians interpret documents differently, leading to multiple accounts of the same event, yet suggesting that this multiplicity does not strip away the existence of factual events, such as the Holocaust. The speaker argues that while interpretations can vary, certain facts remain incontrovertible, underscoring the interplay between subjective interpretation and objective reality. The need for accurate historical narratives is reinforced, highlighting the importance of truth in providing moral accountability.
Philosophical Implications of Non-Realism
The implications of adopting a non-realist stance raise questions about the nature of communication and truth. One speaker posits that non-realism opens the floor for creativity and diverse interpretations but cautions against its potential dangers, such as the emergence of post-truth politics. They argue that while non-realism encourages multiple perspectives, it also risks leading to an erosion of accountability, particularly in contexts where narratives can be manipulated for political gain. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the necessity of balancing subjective interpretations with a commitment to objective facts to avoid falling into a dangerous relativism.
A generation raised on Foucault and Derrida has learned to distrust claims to objective truth. Yet the mantra that 'there is no truth' is a paradox. Do we need a new conception of fantasy and reality to free us from the tyranny of truth makers and the paradoxes of postmodernists alike?
American philosopher John Searle, post-postmodernist Hilary Lawson and Historian of Ideas at KCL Hannah Dawson untangle the truth.
Watch the debate here: https://iai.tv/video/after-the-end-of-truth