

Beyond cognitive biases: improving judgment by reducing noise (with Daniel Kahneman)
Sep 23, 2021
Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel Prize-winning psychologist and pioneer in behavioral economics, discusses the nuances between bias and noise in decision-making. He highlights how judicial outcomes reveal significant variability due to cognitive biases and emphasizes the potential for algorithms to provide more consistent decisions in complex fields like medicine. Kahneman also addresses the Fragile Family Study, illustrating the unpredictability of life outcomes. He shares insights on improving judgment through structured decision-making and the importance of recognizing and addressing noise.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Judgment as Measurement
- Human judgment can be viewed as a measurement, subject to bias and noise, just like physical measurements.
- Bias is the average error, while noise represents the variability of errors, both contributing equally to total error.
Bias vs. Noise
- Thinking, Fast and Slow focused on bias, while Noise explores the often-neglected aspect of variability in judgments.
- Cognitive biases can influence both bias and noise, affecting overall judgment accuracy.
Noise in Judicial Sentencing
- Federal judges exhibit significant noise in sentencing, with an expected four-year difference between two random judges for a seven-year average crime.
- Variability stems from individual biases (e.g., harsher sentencing tendencies based on political views or location) and occasional factors.