The podcast delves into the breakdown of international law in the Israel-Hamas conflict, discussing war crimes and violations. It explores the challenges of protecting civilians in wartime and the blurred lines between civilians and combatants. The discussion also highlights the potential arrest warrants for war crimes and implications on global relations. Additionally, it examines the Biden administration's stance on international law compliance and the role of the United States in upholding global standards.
The breakdown of international law in conflicts like Gaza highlights challenges in protecting civilians.
The blurring of lines between combatants and civilians in modern warfare complicates determining legitimate targets.
Deep dives
The Erosion of International Law and its Impact on Civilian Protection
The podcast discusses how the erosion of international law, especially the laws meant to protect civilians, has led to challenges in conflicts like the one in Gaza. It explores the historical context of international humanitarian law and the efforts made post-World War II to regulate war. The breakdown of clear distinctions between combatants and civilians is highlighted as a significant issue, impacting civilian protection in modern conflicts. The speaker emphasizes the need for the US to take a leadership role in upholding international law to prevent further erosion.
Challenges of Defining 'Direct Participation in Hostilities' in Modern Warfare
The podcast delves into the complexities of determining who is considered to be 'directly participating in hostilities' in modern warfare. It discusses the blurred lines between combatants and civilians due to evolving conflict types and technological advancements. The debate between the ICRC and the US on when civilians become targetable due to their actions is highlighted. The impact of technology on civilian status and the challenges of distinguishing direct participation in hostilities are explored.
Dual-Use Objects and Complications in Targeting Decisions
The episode explains the concept of dual-use objects, items essential for civilian life but also useful for military purposes, and how targeting them has become a contentious issue in modern conflicts. The blurring of lines between legitimate military objectives and civilian objects poses challenges in decision-making during warfare. The shift towards targeting dual-use objects as military objectives is discussed, leading to increased vulnerability of civilians and ethical dilemmas in warfare.
Implications of US Actions on International Law and Humanitarian Principles
The podcast analyzes how the actions and decisions of the US impact international law and humanitarian principles. It highlights the importance of applying the rules of war consistently to all parties involved, irrespective of affiliations. The speaker emphasizes the crucial role of the US in setting an example and holding partners to high standards of international law. The consequences of failing to uphold these standards are explored, emphasizing the need for accountability and maintaining the integrity of international humanitarian law principles.
There’s no question that Hamas violated international law when it attacked Israel on October 7, and as it continues to hold hostages in Gaza. But more than seven months into Israel’s response, the issue of whether Israel is violating international law—or even committing war crimes—is coming to a head. Washington is debating holding up deliveries of weapons to Israel. And the International Criminal Court is rumored to be preparing a case against leaders of both Hamas and the Israeli government.
What’s happening in Gaza may seem unprecedented. But as the legal scholar Oona Hathawaywrites in Foreign Affairs, “The conflict in Gaza is an extreme example of the breakdown of the law of war, but it is not an isolated one.” Hathaway is the Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale University School of Law and a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In 2014–15, she took leave to serve as special counsel to the general counsel at the U.S. Department of Defense.
Foreign Affairs Deputy Editor Kate Brannen spoke with her on May 13 about the causes of that breakdown—and what, if anything, can be done to salvage the rules meant to protect civilians in wartime.