Lisa Lerer, a national political correspondent for The New York Times, delves into the intense and swift search for Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate. She breaks down the pressures and strategic considerations that come with this critical selection process. With the clock ticking, Lerer discusses how candidates from key swing states are evaluated for their demographic appeal and electability. Listeners get insights into the balancing act of navigating political landscapes, all while ensuring diverse voter connections in a polarized environment.
Kamala Harris's accelerated selection process for a running mate poses significant risks due to the tight timeline for proper vetting.
The search for a vice presidential candidate includes balancing demographics and appeal to swing states to broaden electoral support.
Deep dives
The Unusual Selection Process for a Running Mate
The search for a running mate by Kamala Harris is extraordinary due to the unique circumstances of her candidacy and the extremely tight timeline. Unlike previous instances, where the selection process traditionally extends over several months, Harris is expected to make her decision within a mere two to three weeks. This rushed timeline poses significant challenges, as it compresses the essential vetting necessary to ensure a suitable candidate is chosen. A well-considered vetting process typically includes thorough background checks, policy alignment, and personal interviews, all of which are difficult to complete in such a short period, raising concerns about potential risks.
Balancing the Ticket: Criteria for Selection
Harris's approach to selecting a running mate is rooted in a need to balance the ticket and broaden its appeal. The idea is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of her candidacy, such as her identity as a woman from a liberal state, and seek counterbalancing qualities in a potential vice president. This may involve looking for candidates from battleground states or those with contrasting demographics, such as a younger male or someone from a more conservative background. The objective is to attract a diverse voter base, reflecting the varied concerns within the Democratic electorate while also considering what the country might be ready to accept.
Top Contenders and Their Considerations
Several potential candidates have emerged as frontrunners for the vice presidential nomination, reflecting both swing state representation and demographic balancing. Among these are Josh Shapiro, the governor of Pennsylvania, and Mark Kelly, the senator from Arizona, both of whom offer critical insights into appealing to swing voters. However, the selection also carries risks, such as the potential loss of an open Senate seat if Kelly is chosen, highlighting the complex layers of strategy involved in this decision. Conversely, candidates outside swing states include individuals like Governor Andy Bashir of Kentucky, whose appeal to rural voters may not yield the desired electoral gains for a presidential bid.
Navigating Political Risks and Opportunities
The political landscape plays a significant role in shaping the decision-making process for Harris's running mate, especially in light of competing strategies, like those from the Trump camp. While Harris's team contemplates balancing the ticket for broader appeal, there are ongoing debates within the Democratic Party regarding how far they should stretch that concept. For instance, choosing candidates who potentially only serve to cut losses rather than secure victories raises questions about whether a candidate should embody progressive ideals or appeal to moderate voters. Ultimately, the decision is complex, involving an assessment of each candidate's strengths and weaknesses in navigating the current political climate, which may impact not only the electability of the ticket but also the future political landscape of the Democratic Party.
Although Vice President Kamala Harris has officially been a presidential candidate for only about a week, the race to become her running mate is well underway.
Lisa Lerer, a national political correspondent for The New York Times, takes us inside the selection process.
Guest: Lisa Lerer, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode