The hosts tackle a mountain of technical issues, sharing laughs about corrupted file synchronization and digital chaos. They delve into decision-making psychology, based on Daniel Kahneman's acclaimed book, discussing the dual systems of thought that influence our choices. The conversation also touches on digital file management, community fundraising efforts, and the challenges of navigating dense reading. With personal stories and critiques of popular theories, they explore the nuances of cognitive biases and the replication crisis, all while keeping the tone light and engaging.
System 1 and System 2 thinking: Two modes of thinking - automatic and effortful for decision-making.
Availability cascade and Halo effect: Influence of readily available ideas on judgments and biases.
Overestimation of personal contributions and cognitive ease: Encouraging awareness of biases for balanced thinking.
Replication crisis and flawed techniques: Challenges in credibility and validity of book's content.
Deep dives
The Power of System 1 and System 2 Thinking
The book explores the concept of system 1 and system 2 thinking: the idea that our brains have two modes of thinking - automatic and effortful. System 1 is fast and automatic, while system 2 is slower and requires more conscious effort. The book emphasizes the importance of being aware of when we are relying on system 1 thinking and when we need to engage system 2 thinking for more deliberate decision-making.
Availability Cascade and the Halo Effect
The book introduces the concept of availability cascade, which is when ideas or information become more prominent and influential simply because they are more frequently and readily available. It also explores the halo effect, where our perception of someone or something is influenced by a single positive characteristic or attribute. These phenomena highlight the biases and mental shortcuts our brains take, impacting our judgments and decision-making.
The Pitfalls of Overconfidence and Cognitive Ease
The book discusses the tendency for people to overestimate their own contributions and underestimate the contributions of others. It also touches on cognitive ease, the human inclination to make judgments and assessments based on familiarity and availability rather than a thorough examination of all relevant information. These concepts encourage readers to be more aware of their cognitive biases and strive for more balanced thinking.
Challenges with the Book's Dense Content and Excessive Experiment Mentioning
The book's dense content and excessive mention of experiments can make it challenging for readers to stay engaged. The author often provides unnecessarily detailed examples and citations, distracting from the main ideas. Some readers may find the book lacks relatable anecdotes and struggles to maintain reader interest throughout its entirety.
Inaccurate and misleading experiments in social sciences
The podcast episode discusses how the replication crisis in social sciences has undermined the validity of many experiments mentioned in popular books, including the one being discussed. The replication crisis involves the difficulty of reproducing or replicating scientific studies, especially in the social sciences and medicine. The episode explains that a significant percentage of experiments, as referenced in the book, do not replicate or have never been attempted to be replicated. The reliance on these flawed experiments weakens the credibility of the ideas presented in the book.
Questionable techniques and misleading examples
The podcast episode highlights the problematic nature of the author's techniques and examples throughout the book. It criticizes the use of fictional personalities, like Tom and Linda, and asks readers to guess their most likely occupations based on constructed descriptions. The episode argues that this approach creates a false sense of superiority for the author, leading readers to feel wrong or stupid when their guesses do not align with the author's predetermined answers. The inaccurate framing of these social scenarios and math problems adds to the frustration and undermines the credibility of the book's arguments.
Confusing instructions and dismissal of experts
The podcast episode points out the confusing instructions given to readers throughout the book. It highlights instances where the author asks readers not to solve a math problem or to trust their intuition, and then later criticizes them for arriving at incorrect answers. The episode also raises concerns about the author's dismissal of experts, suggesting that while experts cannot predict the future perfectly, their expertise and knowledge should not be completely disregarded. The episode argues that the book's attempt to convey these ideas is flawed, leading to misguided judgments and a sense of elitism.
Grey has an issue with four hundred thousand files, Myke is preparing the balloons, and they both read 'Thinking, Fast and Slow'.
This episode of Cortex is sponsored by:
Squarespace: Make your next move. Enter offer code CORTEX at checkout to get 10% off your first purchase.
Muse for iPad: Turn your iPad into a tool for thought.
Memberful: Best-in-class membership software for independent creators, publishers, educators, podcasters, and more. Get started now, no credit card required.
