Exploring wealth disparity, philosopher Ingrid Robens proposes capping personal wealth at $10 million to tackle extreme inequality. Debate on wealth caps' impact on democracy, society, and the environment. Perspectives on wealth limits to address income inequality and stimulate innovation. Insights into Iran's political landscape and business opportunities.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Ingrid Robeyns proposes a $10 million cap on personal wealth to combat global wealth inequality and promote a more equal distribution of resources.
Implementing personal wealth limits can coexist with corporate wealth growth, addressing economic disparities without hindering innovation or productivity.
Deep dives
Inequality and Wealth Gap
Ingrid Robens, a philosopher and economist, proposes Limitarianism, suggesting a $10 million cap on personal wealth to address the increasing global wealth gap. This is based on the idea that extreme wealth concentration harms society, undermines democracy, and is incompatible with sustainability efforts like climate justice. Robens argues that reducing wealth inequality can lead to a better world for all and unlock untapped potential.
Challenges and Criticisms
Critics like self-made billionaire John Cordwell oppose Limitarianism, believing it would hinder motivation and innovation in capitalism. They argue that imposing wealth limits could discourage productivity and hinder economic growth. Robens counters this by highlighting that personal wealth limits do not apply to corporate wealth, allowing companies to grow and innovate while promoting a more equal distribution of wealth.
Implementation and Response
Implementation challenges of enforcing personal wealth caps involve addressing tax havens and wealth hiding practices common among the wealthy. Robens acknowledges resistance and skepticism, emphasizing the importance of deeper discourse beyond headline reactions. While her book on Limitarianism elicits mixed responses, it sparks crucial conversations on wealth inequality, economic systems, and the need for alternative approaches to address societal disparities.
Today, the richest 10 per cent of the world’s population own more than three quarters of its wealth, while the bottom half have 2%.
To halt the growing wealth gap, one economic philosopher, Ingrid Robeyns, has come up with a striking proposal - to impose legally enforced limits on people’s personal wealth. No one individual, Professor Robeyns suggests, should be allowed to have more than 10 million dollars.
It's a provocative idea. And would it work in practice?
(Picture: Ingrid Robeyns. Credit: Keke Keukelaar/United Agents)
Presented and produced by Ed Butler
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode