The Daily Why Democrats Are Bankrolling Far-Right Candidates
Aug 3, 2022
Jonathan Weisman, a congressional correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the intriguing strategy of Democrats meddling in Republican primaries. He discusses the controversial choice to boost far-right candidates, believing they'll be easier to defeat in the midterms. The dynamics in Michigan spark heated debates, especially with moderate Peter Meyer facing MAGA-aligned John Gibbs. Unintended consequences of a negative ad campaign highlight the risks of this tactic, raising questions about its effects on party dynamics and democracy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
McCaskill's Gamble
- Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Senator, meddled in the 2012 Republican primary by boosting the most conservative candidate, Todd Akin.
- Her strategy worked; Akin won the primary but lost the general election after a controversial gaffe.
Resurgence of Meddling
- Meddling in primaries was rare before 2022 but resurfaced due to the unique political climate.
- This strategy is being used by Democrats in various races across the country where moderate Republicans face MAGA candidates.
Examples of 2022 Meddling
- Democrats used ads to portray Chris Matisse as the "true conservative" against David Valadeo in California.
- They also backed Darren Bailey in Illinois and several other far-right candidates in other states.