Explore the fascinating world of ADHD research, focusing on the significance of peer-reviewed studies. Discover tips for navigating complex research papers and understanding their structures. Uncover how sample sizes and funding influences can impact study credibility. The discussion emphasizes critical thinking when interpreting findings and highlights the need for transparency in research methodologies. Prepare to sharpen your research skills while decoding the nuances of ADHD studies!
19:28
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Peer-Reviewed Journals
Look for peer-reviewed journals for credible ADHD research.
Be aware that journals aren't beginner-friendly; they're written for experts.
insights INSIGHT
Journals as Beginner Sources
Peer-reviewed journals are not ideal as a primary information source for the average reader.
They're complex and require pre-existing knowledge for proper interpretation.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Statistical vs. Practical Significance
Statistical significance doesn't always equate to practical significance.
A small improvement, like a 5% reduction in impulsivity, might be statistically significant but not practically meaningful.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
We’re diving right back into the world of ADHD research, continuing on from what we were talking about a few episodes back. In this episode, we’re going to be more focused on what goes into making ADHD research reliable. I go in-depth into what you can expect to find when reading a study and then also into what thing to look out for when trying to determine what’s really going on in those studies.
We’ll discuss how to navigate the sometimes confusing world of peer-reviewed journals, why sample sizes matter, and what to watch out for when it comes to conflicts of interest (I mean, everyone is interested in how ADHD research is funded, right?).
This piece was also initially going to cover misinformation, but with how much ended up going into everything else, I’m saving that for next week.
The first step in examining a research paper’s credibility is to ensure that it is peer-reviewed. The peer-review process will cover many of the other steps that we discussed in this episode. While there is value in some non-peer-reviewed work, it’s important that we approach it with a skeptical lens.
However, with that first tip, we should also know that we shouldn’t view peer-reviewed journals as a beginner’s source. They are written with the expectation of other experts as the intended audience, and without the prerequisite knowledge, it can be easy to misinterpret what is being said.
One of the largest concerns about ADHD research comes from worries that pharmaceutical money will introduce bias into many of the studies; however, most research is actually funded through government grants, and the peer-review process is designed to help identify conflicts of interest and eliminate any bias that may be present.
Hacking Your ADHD