Lars Wiuff Andersen, a leading expert in pre-hospital critical care, and Mikael Fink Valentine, a researcher in cardiac arrest, delve into the findings of the groundbreaking IVIO trial. They compare intraosseous and intravenous access methods during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The discussion reveals similar efficacy between the two techniques, emphasizing the importance of skilled emergency teams. Insights into medication access routes and the implications of trial outcomes for future emergency practices are particularly fascinating.
The IVIO trial found no significant difference in the return of spontaneous circulation between intraosseous and intravenous access during cardiac arrest.
High success rates for intraosseous access highlight its potential advantages in emergency situations, despite similar drug administration times for both methods.
Deep dives
Overview of the IVIO Trial Design
The Danish IVIO trial, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled study, investigated the effectiveness of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) access during adult cardiac arrest, focusing on drug administration for those in need. Conducted in Denmark from 2022 to 2024, it involved approximately 1,500 patients, with 731 assigned to the IO group and 748 to the IV group. The primary outcome measured was the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), which was achieved in 30% of the IO group compared to 29% of the IV group, indicating no significant difference in immediate resuscitation success. The findings align with ongoing discussions in the cardiac arrest community regarding the implications of vascular access routes on drug efficacy during emergencies, particularly emphasizing the growing trend toward IO access in pre-hospital settings.
Comparison of Access Success Rates and Timing
The trial revealed that the success rate for establishing IO access was notably higher at 98% compared to 82% for IV access within two attempts, yet both methods had similar drug administration times. One possible reason for the comparable times may be the recommended practice for IO access, which advocates changing the site after an unsuccessful attempt, potentially elongating the process. The researchers also noted the critical role of experience among healthcare providers in the administration of IO access, highlighting the lack of comprehensive data on the number of IO placements performed by individual clinicians prior to the trial. Despite these operational differences, the timely establishment of vascular access remains crucial for initiating advanced life support during cardiac arrest.
Implications of Trial Findings on Clinical Practice
The results of the IVIO trial, combined with similar studies, suggest that there is little difference in long-term outcomes such as survival rates and favorable neurological recovery between IO and IV access in cardiac arrest cases. The trial emphasized the need for clinicians to consider various factors when deciding on the method of vascular access, as patient management should not solely depend on the type of access. Additionally, despite some slight advantages noted for IV access in ROSC rates in other trials, the consensus was that no substantial differences could justify a protocol shift in practice. As further guidelines on this matter are expected to be published, the findings indicate that emergency medical providers can efficiently utilize both IO and IV access without significant differences in patient outcomes.
Rob Mac Sweeney discusses the IVIO trial with investigators Lars Wiuff Andersen and Mikael Fink Valentine from Aarhus, Denmark. The IVIO trial compared intraosseous with intravenous vascular access in adult patients suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. It was presented at the 2024 European Resuscitation Council congress in Athens and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode