Full Story Back to Back Barries: could the antisemitism plan be used to silence dissent?
Jul 11, 2025
The hosts delve into a controversial government plan to combat antisemitism, raising questions about its potential to intimidate universities. They discuss Trump's tariffs on pharmaceuticals and their impact on international trade, emphasizing how these decisions can affect local jobs. The conversation shifts to job onshoring strategies and their political implications amid rising interest rates, particularly as election season approaches. Lastly, they explore the evolving political landscape in Australia, highlighting key shifts and the influence of independent candidates.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Controversy Over University Funding Plan
- The government's proposal to tackle antisemitism by defunding universities is divisive and may intimidate rather than solve issues.
- There are concerns about vague demands on universities with harsh penalties, though current handling is viewed as adequate by some.
The Slippery Slope of Subjective Enforcement
- Enforcement, not new laws, is key to combating antisemitism; existing laws should be used effectively.
- Allowing a small group to decide funding based on subjective assessments risks dangerous precedents.
Risks in Targeted Anti-Semitism Measures
- Anti-Semitism education should be part of broader lessons on racism and bigotry.
- Visa screening for anti-Semitism risks misuse, such as penalizing pro-Palestinian sympathies, seen in US cases.