Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, dives deep into the complex realities of gun disposal and repurposing in America. He shares insights on how well-intentioned gun buyback programs can lead to unintended consequences. While innovative disposal methods like firearms pulverization are introduced, ethical dilemmas arise as salvaged parts enter the secondary market. McIntire discusses the feelings of betrayal among those who hoped for permanent elimination of their surrendered guns, revealing the challenges of achieving true community safety.
Efforts to remove guns from circulation by turning them over for destruction have unintended consequences.
GunBusters' method of gun disposal raises concerns about loopholes and potential misuse of firearms.
Deep dives
Efforts to Remove Guns from Circulation
Many towns and cities in America are trying to remove guns from circulation by turning them over to businesses for destruction. However, a New York Times investigation revealed that a significant number of these guns are not being destroyed. This poses unintended consequences for local officials' efforts to rid their communities of firearms.
Types of Guns and Their Disposal
Unwanted guns that need to be disposed of come from various sources, such as police confiscations, turning in guns people no longer want, or upgrading service weapons. Police departments often find themselves overwhelmed with surplus firearms. Traditional methods of disposal involve melting down guns or using blowtorches or sledgehammers to render them inoperable. In recent years, buyback programs have become popular, where incentives are offered to people to turn in unwanted guns. However, the process of disposing of guns is not as simple as it appears.
The Gun Disposal Dilemma
GunBusters, a private company, introduced a new method of gun disposal called the firearms pulverizer. They take in unwanted guns from police agencies and dismantle them, selling salvaged parts and scrap metal while destroying only one specific component, which is legally considered a firearm. The remaining parts are then sold online as gun kits, allowing buyers to assemble functional firearms without background checks or the involvement of licensed dealers. While this business model has been profitable for GunBusters, it raises concerns about loopholes, increased availability of gun parts, and potential misuse of firearms.
Across the United States, hundreds of towns and cities are trying to get guns off the streets by turning them over to businesses that offer to destroy them.
But a New York Times investigation found that something very different is happening.
Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter at The Times, explains the unintended consequences of efforts by local officials to rid their communities of guns.
Guest: Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode