Stay Tuned with Preet Is There a Right to Privacy of Thought? (with Nita Farahany)
Jul 14, 2022
Nita Farahany, a Duke Law professor and expert on the ethical implications of neuroscience and AI, discusses how brain monitoring technologies may reshape privacy laws, especially in workplaces and courtrooms. She challenges the validity of the concept of a 'gene for violence' and highlights the role of AI in influencing judicial outcomes like bail and sentencing. The conversation also touches on cognitive liberty, mental privacy rights, and the urgent need for ethical guidelines in the face of emerging technologies.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Brain Monitoring Capabilities
- Brain monitoring can decode simple thoughts and mental states like fatigue or attention.
- AI algorithms analyze brainwave patterns, which are similar across individuals.
ALS Patient Communication
- An ALS patient used brain-computer interface to communicate, expressing his desire for a beer.
- This technology allows communication for those with disabilities, highlighting its positive impact.
The Double-Edged Sword of Brain Monitoring
- Brain monitoring offers exciting possibilities, but also risks to mental privacy.
- Sharing brain data with tech companies and governments is a potential downside.
